Back

Graph-based characterization of in vitro neuronal network maturation using machine learning and digital holographic microscopy

Yazdani, Z.; Belanger, E.; Moreaud, M.; Llinares, J.; Allard, A.; Marquet, P.; Desrosiers, P.

2026-06-23 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.18.732973 bioRxiv
Show abstract

SignificanceDigital Holographic Microscopy (DHM) provides label-free quantitative phase images (QPIs) of living cells and has become a powerful tool for studying cellular morphology and dynamics. While most DHM studies have focused on cell-level analysis, the quantitative characterization of neuronal network organization and maturation from DHM images remains largely unexplored, highlighting the need for dedicated computational approaches. AimWe aimed to develop an automated framework combining deep-learning-based image analysis and graph theory to quantitatively characterize the organization, connectivity, and maturation of neuronal networks in primary rat cortical cultures imaged by DHM. ApproachTwo U-Net convolutional neural networks were trained on manually annotated DHM phase images to segment neuronal cell bodies and neurites. The resulting segmentation maps were used to infer putative morphological connections between neurons and generate graph representations of neuronal networks, referred to as graph fingerprints. A panel of 18 connectomics-inspired graph features was then computed to characterize local and global properties of network organization across four stages of culture maturation. ResultsThe mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was 0.98 for cell-body and 0.91 for neurite segmentation, indicating near-perfect identification. Graph-theoretical analysis revealed reproducible topological changes during network maturation in vitro, including increased density, reduced modularity, and progressive network integration. Correlation analysis showed that the 18 graph features grouped into two highly correlated families. A Random Forest classifier identified density and modularity as the most informative descriptors, achieving an accuracy of 87% in classifying maturation stages of neuronal cultures. ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that combining DHM, deep-learning-based segmentation, and graphtheoretical analysis enables quantitative characterization of neuronal network organization and maturation from label-free phase images. This framework provides a foundation for future studies of pharmacological experiments, neuronal network phenotyping, and human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived neuronal cultures, where quantitative assessment of network organization remains a major challenge.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
27.3%
2
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
4
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.2%
7
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
8
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
9
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.5%
10
BMC Neuroscience
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
11
Neurophotonics
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
12
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
13
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
14
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.1%
16
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
20
MethodsX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.6%
24
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
26
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
27
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
29
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%