Back

Biopsychosocial determinants of HPV vaccine perception in university students of both sexes in Cucuta, Colombia, 2024: a cross-sectional study

ARIAS-SANCHEZ, A.; Florez, M.; Pereira, N.; Caceres-Penaloza, D. Y.; Dallos Rivera, L. S.; Nunez-Villamizar, K. G.; Beltran - Arroyave, C.

2026-06-22 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.06.18.26356011 medRxiv
Show abstract

Colombia has been internationally recognised as a paradigmatic case of vaccine confidence crisis since the 2014 Carmen de Bolivar event, and national HPV vaccination coverage remains far below the World Health Organization 2030 target. Most published evidence focuses on female adolescents and on cervical cancer; the perception of the HPV vaccine in university-age populations of both sexes--and across the broader spectrum of HPV-attributable disease--remains comparatively understudied. We aimed to describe the influence of biopsychosocial determinants on HPV vaccine perception among university students of both sexes in Cucuta, Norte de Santander, Colombia. We conducted a cross-sectional study with a mixed quantitative-qualitative approach in 2024 among four universities (Universidad de Santander, Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander, Universidad de Pamplona and Universidad Libre; combined enrolment 21,033 students). Using convenience sampling stratified by institution, 750 actively enrolled undergraduate students of both sexes (18-60 years) completed a structured online questionnaire adapted from previously validated instruments. The instrument captured sociodemographic information, HPV knowledge and HPV vaccine perception. Data were analysed using Students t-test, one-way analysis of variance, Tukey post-hoc tests, effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals, with a 0.05 significance threshold. Of 750 respondents, 54.2% were women, 61.3% were under 20 years of age, and 75.1% attended public universities. HPV knowledge was high in 39.2%, intermediate in 42.4% and low in 18.4%; women and students aged 26 years or older displayed higher knowledge. Although 91.2% had heard of HPV and 82.5% knew that both sexes could acquire it, recognition of clinical manifestations and complications was uneven: cervical cancer 51.7%, penile cancer 30.5%, vaginal warts 45.9% and warts in the penis, larynx, anus or rectum 34.0%. Vaccine-specific knowledge was low in 77.1%, with men disproportionately represented (85.9% versus 69.5% in women). Overall positive perception of HPV vaccination was 66.6%, slightly higher in women (68.8%) than men (63.9%), in students aged 26 years or older (70.1%) and in students from private universities (68.1% versus 65.9%). Inferential analysis identified sex (Cohens d = -0.357), type of university (d = 0.189) and HPV knowledge (partial eta-squared = 0.096) as the only significant determinants. Age, socioeconomic stratum, age at sexual debut and vaccine-specific knowledge did not reach meaningful significance. HPV vaccine perception was predominantly positive but conditioned by three biopsychosocial determinants, with HPV knowledge as the primary driver. The persistent gender gap reflects historical anchoring of HPV messaging in cervical disease and female-targeted campaigns. Public-health strategies should adopt comprehensive, gender-inclusive educational interventions that explicitly visibilise non-cervical HPV-related cancers and address both sexes from a common evidence base.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.8%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.2%
3
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.2%
4
Sexually Transmitted Infections
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
8
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.2%
9
Infectious Diseases
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.6%
11
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
12
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
13
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Archives of Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Annals of Internal Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
23
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Vaccine: X
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
25
Emerging Infectious Diseases
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%