Back

Emergency integrative supportive care program for frail patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A prospective GERCOR ARCAD study

Rousseau, B.; Hilmi, M.; Falcoz, A.; Vernerey, D.; Toullec, C.; Lecomte, T.; Lambert, A.; Tournigand, C.; Guerin-Meyer, V.; Louvet, C.; Trouilloud, I.; Rinaldi, Y.; Coriat, R.; Dauba, J.; Neuzillet, C.; Andre, T.; Bachet, J.-B.; Cros, J.; de la Fouchardiere, C.; Garcia-Larnicol, M.-L.; de Gramont, A.; Hammel, P.

2026-06-22 oncology
10.64898/2026.06.18.26355998 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC) often experience general health decline at diagnosis due to a high-symptom burden. The optimal management of symptoms and/or poor performance status (PS) in these patients remains an unmet medical need. Patients and Methods In this multicenter study, patients with PS[≥]2 and pathologically confirmed or imaging-suspected aPDAC were included at first oncology visit in a personalized 14-day emergency integrative supportive care program (14-EISCP) to manage pain, nutrition, diagnostics, and stenting procedures. The primary endpoint was the 14-EISCP success in feasibility of planned procedures and clinical benefit defined as post-EISCP PS[≤]1, [≥]5 points improvement in fatigue, pain, global health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL), or chemotherapy initiation within 30 days. Results A total of 106 patients were included; 93 evaluable patients considered for primary endpoint analysis (median age: 76 years [68-80], PS3: 20.9%, metastases: 61.3%). The median overall survival was 4.1 months (IC95% 2.6-5.6). The 14-EISCP was successful in 59.1% (n=55) of patients, meeting the primary objective (clinically relevant). The 14-EISCP feasibility was achieved in 70.9% of cases. Post-EISCP clinical benefit was observed in 79.6% of patients, with PS improvement to 0/1 in 13.2%, HRQoL improvement in 23.9%, and chemotherapy initiation [≤]30 days in 73.1%. Among evaluable patients, 17.2% received mFOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel, 35.4% received FOLFOX, 25.3% had gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil alone, and 22.2% received best supportive care. In patients with PS2 at baseline, the administration of doublet/triplet chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival compared to single-agent. Discussion These results offer a promising framework for improving outcomes in aPDAC patients, bridging the gap between symptom management and systemic therapy administration. Conclusions In patients with PS[≥]2 and aPDAC, the personalized 14-EISCP was feasible and lead to meaningful clinical benefit, allowing doublet or triplet chemotherapy in half the patients.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.7%
3
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
4
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
5
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
6
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
7
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
8
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
12
American Journal of Gastroenterology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.7%
15
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
Cancer Letters
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Gut
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
20
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
24
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
Pharmacological Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
26
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
27
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
28
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
29
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
30
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%