Back

Trial protocol: A hybrid effectiveness-implementation study of Paediatric Autism Communication Therapy (PACT) in the Brazilian public health system

Godoy, P. B. G.; Windlin, I. C.; Cardoso, L. M. d. S.; Yoshida, J.; Lopes, D. C. P.; Arruda, K. d. S.; Junior, P. C. P. d. O.; de Aquino, I. F.; Alves, R. P.; Constancio, T. N.; Aguiar, I. M.; dos Santos, T. F.; Diniz, D. L. N.; Lilge, L. A. L. C.; de Castro, M. P.; Proenca, J. d. B. S. C.; Prazeres, G. d. A.; Molina-Avejonas, D.; Salomone, E.; Leadbitter, K.; Green, J.; Shephard, E.

2026-06-22 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.06.18.26355880 medRxiv
Show abstract

In Brazil, autistic children and their families face significant challenges in accessing evidence-based interventions, especially via the national public health service. Here, we report the protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial, which will investigate the large-scale implementation of Paediatric Autism Communication Therapy (PACT) as well as its real-world effectiveness in Brazilian public health services for autistic children. Eligible professionals from public health services across the five regions of Brazil will be trained in PACT. They will deliver the intervention, which consists of 14 sessions delivered over 6 months, to dyads of autistic children and their caregivers in their regular clinical practice for the trial period of 18 months. We will use elements of three implementation science frameworks to systematically study factors that influence the implementation of PACT in this setting. To study effectiveness dyads will be randomised to receive PACT immediately or following a 6-month waitlist, stratified by healthcare service. Effectiveness outcomes (parent-child interaction, child adaptive social communication skills, caregiver well-being) will be collected pre- and post-PACT/waitlist and compared between groups. This trial will provide the first evidence on the effectiveness of PACT implemented in a public health system and the barriers and facilitators to such large-scale implementation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 5%
27.3%
2
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
5
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 5%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
7
BMC Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Autism Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
10
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
12
BMJ Paediatrics Open
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
Molecular Autism
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
14
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
15
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
17
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Genes, Brain and Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
22
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
JCPP Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%