Genetic and Shared Environmental Influences on Cancer Risk and Cross-Cancer Associations in Nordic Twins
Harris, J. R.; Clemmensen, S. B.; Adami, H.-O.; Mucci, L. A.; Kaprio, J.; Hjelmborg, J. v. B.
Show abstract
The relative contributions of genetic and shared environmental influences to cancer risk and cross-cancer associations remain poorly understood. We analyzed data from 222,530 same-sex twins from Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden in the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer, including 43,060 incident cancers over a median follow-up of 41.6 years. Using a target trial framework, biometric modeling, and competing-risk adjustment, we estimated familial risk, heritability, and shared environmental contributions across 35 cancer sites. Lifetime cancer risk was 36.5%, increasing to 51.4% in monozygotic (MZ) twins and 45.3% in dizygotic (DZ) twins with an affected co-twin. Overall cancer risk was explained by heritable (28%) and shared environmental (40%) influences. Heritability was highest for prostate (42%), non-melanoma skin (24%), and breast (18%) cancers. Cross-cancer analyses revealed extensive overlap in the genetic and shared environmental factors across sites, consistent with widespread pleiotropy and shared environmental susceptibility. Prostate cancer exhibited the strongest genetic overlap with rectum/anus (12%) and kidney (11%) cancers, whereas co-shared environmental influences were most pronounced for breast-lung (11%), prostate-bladder (11%), and prostate-lung (12%) cancers. These findings show pervasive genetic overlap across cancers at different sites and emphasize the importance of incorporating familial shared environmental exposures into cancer risk prediction and prevention strategies.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Proteogenomic and observational evidence implicate ANGPTL4 as a potential therapeutic target for colorectal cancer prevention 94%
- Genetic analysis of lung cancer reveals novel susceptibility loci and germline impact on somatic mutation burden 92%
- Polygenic risk of any, metastatic, and fatal prostate cancer in the Million Veteran Program 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hereditary haemochromatosis beyond liver cancer: increased risk of prostate cancer during an 11-year follow-up 95%
- A new colorectal cancer risk prediction model incorporating family history, personal and environmental factors 94%
- Causal effects of breast cancer risk factors across hormone receptor breast cancer subtypes: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Methylation scores for smoking, alcohol consumption, and body mass index and risk of seven types of cancer 94%
- Circulating white blood cell traits and colorectal cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study 93%
- Free testosterone and malignant melanoma risk in men: prospective analyses of testosterone and SHBG with 19 cancers in men and postmenopausal women UK Biobank 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pan-cancer analysis demonstrates that integrating polygenic risk scores with modifiable risk factors improves risk prediction 98%
- Risk factors for eight common cancers revealed from a phenome-wide Mendelian randomisation analysis of 378,142 cases and 485,715 controls 96%
- Cross-Cancer Evaluation of Polygenic Risk Scores for 17 Cancer Types in Two Large Cohorts 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The contribution of coding variants to the heritability of multiple cancer types using UK Biobank whole-exome sequencing data 97%
- Segregation analysis of 17,425 population-based breast cancer families: evidence for genetic susceptibility and risk prediction 95%
- A polygenic score-based approach to identify gene-drug interactions stratifying breast cancer risk 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.