Back

Community Resource: A Genome-Based Extension of Large-Scale Wheat Proteogenomics

Vincent, D.; Appels, R.

2026-07-08 plant biology
10.64898/2026.06.17.733048 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) possesses a large and highly repetitive allohexaploid genome and annotation requires extensive protein-level validation. We developed a genome-based wheat proteogenomics workflow integrating large-scale MS/MS reanalysis, GFF3-based peptide coordinate reconstruction, thorough validation, and genome browser-compatible peptide deployment against the IWGSC RefSeq v2.1 reference genome. Public wheat proteomics datasets comprising 577 raw mass spectrometry files ([~]1.0 TB) from 32 tissues were reprocessed using FragPipe/MSFragger, generating 2,226,779 non-redundant peptides and 1,648,740 unique protein accessions. Peptide-to-genome projections using GFF3 annotation files produced 8,291,056 genomic peptide projected rows, of which 98.14% passed validation procedures. Overall, peptide evidence supported 103,095 high-confidence (HC) and 135,495 low-confidence (LC) wheat gene models, corresponding to 96.4% and 84.7% of all parsed HC and LC annotations, respectively. In total, 238,590 wheat gene models (89.4% of all parsed annotations) received protein-level support. Apollo/JBrowse-compatible BED tracks enabled exon-resolved visualisation of peptide evidence across wheat chromosomes. Together, this study establishes a scalable GFF3-based proteogenomics framework for complex polyploid plant genomes and provides an extensive community resource for wheat genome annotation refinement and visual exploration (https://bread-wheat-um.genome.edu.au/apollo/49826/jbrowse/index.html). Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=63 SRC="FIGDIR/small/733048v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (16K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6e797org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14ea4fdorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@31f027org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8d908a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PROTEOMICS
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.3%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.0%
4
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.0%
6
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
8
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.9%
10
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.5%
11
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
12
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
15
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
17
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
19
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
20
Plant Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
22
Journal of Proteomics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%
24
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
25
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.5%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.5%