Back

A general model for the evolution of thermal performance curves with application to real time-series data

Min, J.; Chapman, Z.; McCabe, E.; Nunez, J. C. B.; Teets, N.; Lotterhos, K. E.

2026-06-20 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.17.733045 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Thermal performance curves (TPCs) are widely used to investigate the effect of changes in body temperature on an organisms performance. Despite empirical evidence that temperature-dependent performance is ubiquitous across taxa, the field lacks models for how thermal performance evolves under realistic timeseries, genetic architectures, and physiological constraints. We address this gap by integrating a mathematical model with individual-based quantitative population genetic simulations. Our model can predict the evolutionary trajectory and shape of TPCs for any given thermal regime. Our model reproduces core properties of TPC evolution from previous studies such as the emergence of generalists in variable environments, but also explains why organisms may evolve TPCs that do not match their historical body temperature range. We uncover novel dynamics of adaptive tracking, the most notable being multi-generation lags between temperature and TPC parameters that can lead to unexpected correlations between the two. Our model predicts empirically observed patterns of adaptive tracking of critical thermal minimum in the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii, including individual-level variability and multi-generation lags with changing temperature. Our results also highlight the limitations of models that ignore factors that influence TPC evolution and individual variability, such as autocorrelation in temperature timeseries, effective population size, evolution of additive genetic correlation in TPC parameters, genetic architecture, and physiological constraints. Our flexible simulation model can incorporate these factors and help generate empirically testable hypotheses of how species will evolve in response to global climate change.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
2
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.9%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.7%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 13%
4.0%
5
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
6
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
9
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
11
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
12
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
13
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.9%
15
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
19
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
20
Evolutionary Ecology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Theoretical Population Biology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
28
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
29
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
30
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%