Back

Artificial Intelligence Models for Classifying Wrist Ligament Injuries Using Synthetically-Generated Joint Proximity Maps from Finite Element Models

Chen, H.-Y.; Camp, J.; Trentadue, T. P.; Thoreson, A. R.; Leng, S.; Holmes, D. R.; Kakar, S.; An, K.-N.; Zhao, K. D.; Andreassen, T. E.

2026-06-21 biophysics
10.64898/2026.06.17.733030 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background/PurposeDiagnosing wrist ligament injuries is challenging; early detection and treatment are important to prevent osteoarthritis progression. Interosseous proximity maps, a proxy measure for joint space, can be generated from volumetric imaging data and may provide important information about wrist health. Artificial intelligence (AI) could enhance accuracy of noninvasive diagnosis based on imaging-derived metrics. This work demonstrates feasibility of AI training using synthetic proximity map data generated from finite element models (FEMs). MethodsPersonalized wrist FEMs for two asymptomatic participants were created from four-dimensional computed tomography-derived anatomic and kinematic data. Monte Carlo sampling varied 22 ligament material properties and simulated 7,500 unique injury scenarios generating 9,000,000 labeled red, green, and blue (RGB) images of interosseous proximity vector fields from FEM-derived motions. Images were associated with 17 descriptive metrics, including gross wrist angles and bone surface pairs, and used to develop mixed-input convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Model performance was evaluated for identifying specific ligament injuries. ResultsAverage area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for CNNs was 0.757 across all injury types and kinematics. In a subset with clinically-relevant functional angles, the average AUROC was 0.824. Best-performing individual ligament AUROCs ranged from 0.807 to 0.999. Sensitivities and specificities exceeded 0.99 for some ligament injury simulations under specific wrist angles and bone surface pairs. ConclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of using synthetic data from FEMs to train AI models for classifying wrist ligament injuries. Proximity-based RGB images may be a relevant biomarker of ligamentous injury.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
2
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.4%
6
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.4%
8
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
10
Bone
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
12
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
13
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
18
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.1%
21
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
22
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
25
Experimental Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
28
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Animals
23 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
30
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%