Back

Mechanical tension expands the microtubule lattice stepwise and modulates kinesin-1 binding in an isoform-dependent manner

Lurz, Y.; Fischer, B. S. J.; Mishra, J.; Muras, L.; Schaeffer, E.; Ostap, E. M.; Mohd Rafiq, N.; Kulic, I.; Pyrpassopoulos, S.

2026-06-22 biophysics
10.64898/2026.06.17.732986 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent work has shown that the microtubule lattice possesses remarkable structural plasticity, with its conformation modulated by microtubule-associated proteins and motor proteins. However, how this plasticity responds to mechanical forces remains poorly understood. Here, we developed optical tweezers and fluorescence microscopy assays to measure the effect of tensile forces on single microtubules. Quantum dot decoration enabled nanometre-precision measurement of lattice distortions of [~]0.33% under a change of mean tensile force of [<]{Delta}F[>] = 10.6 pN, within the range Fmin = 1.29 pN to Fmax = 22.3 pN -- comparable to forces from one to three kinesin-1 motors. Within this force range, the binding rate of kinesin-1 isoform KIF5B decreased reversibly within seconds by [~]20% and the dissociation rate increased by [~]10%, reducing mean run length, that in extreme cases decreased by up to 46%. Substantial heterogeneity was also observed along individual microtubules, where distinct lattice regions responded differently to applied force, implying that lattice expansion is not always uniform. Consistent heterogeneity was observed in cells, where MAPs with competing conformational preferences assembled in non-overlapping patches along the same microtubule. A cooperatively-switching lattice Ising model based on tubulin conformational bistability, supported by dynamics simulations, quantitatively reproduces these observations with a critical switching force Fc = 8.5 pN, similar to established mechanosensory proteins such as talin and E-catenin. Strikingly, no significant effects were observed for KIF5C, revealing a kinesin isoform-dependent mechanoresponse. Together, these findings establish microtubules as mechanochemical signal transducers, converting mechanical forces into biochemical signals with the speed, spatial precision and sensitivity required for rapid cellular responses. Significance StatementMicrotubules have been implicated as mechanotransducers in both mammalian and plant cells, yet a physical characterization of how mechanical forces are sensed and transduced into biochemical signals has been lacking. The present study demonstrates that modest tensile forces of less than 20 pN are sufficient to expand cooperatively the microtubule lattice by [~]0.3%, which in turn modulates its biochemical interactions with kinesin-1 in an isoform-dependent manner, selectively affecting KIF5B motor activity but not KIF5C. Strikingly, this mechanotransduction occurs on a timescale of seconds, implying that microtubules are highly efficient conduits for propagating mechanical information across the cell body. These findings establish microtubules as bona fide mechanochemical signal transducers with the speed and sensitivity required for rapid cellular responses.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
19.1%
2
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
19.1%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 9%
10.1%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Physics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
6
Cytoskeleton
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.3%
8
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.0%
11
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
Nature Materials
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.8%
14
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.5%
16
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
18
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
20
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
22
Communications Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
23
Journal of General Physiology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%