Back

Aperiodic exponent ceases to track changes in propofol dose at deep surgery-level hypnotic depths

Boncompte, G.; Pedemonte, J. C.; Cortinez, L. I.; Ibacache, M.; Calderon, N.; Biggs, D.

2026-06-22 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.17.732951 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAccurately tracking hypnotic depth during surgery is key to deliver personalized and precise anaesthesia. The aperiodic exponent of electroencephalographic (EEG) data has shown great promise as a marker of the balance between excitatory and inhibitory cortical activity and of hypnotic depth. In humans, this relation has been mostly evidenced by pairwise comparisons between awake and superficial anaesthesia states. However, it is unclear if this relation is also present across deeper hypnotic depths. Here we examined the relation between aperiodic exponent and hypnotic depth across different surgery-level propofol doses. MethodsThe present was an exploratory prospective observational analytical study where we recorded high-density EEG data from patients before surgery and during continuous target-controlled propofol infusions with different intraoperative target concentrations. We evaluated the relation between steady-state propofol dose and several EEG features including aperiodic exponent and spectral band powers. ResultsAll EEG measures were different when comparing awake versus anaesthesia conditions. At surgery-level hypnotic depths, some spectral band powers continued to track propofol dose displaying either with positive (delta R2 = 0.23, p = 0.001) or negative correlations (alpha R2 = 0.36, p < 0.001; beta R2 = 0.045, p < 0.001). Importantly, the aperiodic exponent was not associated with propofol doses absolute value (R2 = 0.011, p = 0.43) or with its relative change (R2 = 0.011, p = 0.51). ConclusionsOur results suggest that the relation between aperiodic exponent and excitatory/inhibitory balance is circumscribed to more superficial hypnotic depths than those typically employed for surgery.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.6%
2
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.9%
4
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.9%
5
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.6%
6
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.9%
8
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
11
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
14
Neuroscience of Consciousness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
British Journal of Anaesthesia
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.0%
20
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Critical Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Journal of Neurotrauma
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
23
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
25
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%