Back

Interaction forces reflect the perception of texture during active exploration

Darabi, N.; Delhaye, B. P.; Bensmaia, S. J.; Palmer, S. E.; Sobinov, A. R.

2026-06-22 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.17.732939 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWWe are constantly exploring the world around us through touch. Active touch depends on coordination of movement and force, yet the forces used during natural exploration and their relationship with perception is largely unexplored. Here we measured exploration forces together with fingertip motion while 17 participants explored 14 textures and rated their perceived hardness, slipperiness, or roughness. Exploration strategies differed systematically across tasks: hardness judgments involved relatively stationary pressing with larger and more variable normal forces, whereas slipperiness and roughness judgments relied more on sweeping movements. Within tasks, interaction forces covaried with perceptual ratings: harder textures elicited larger maximum tangential forces, consistent with diagonal pressing, while more slippery textures were explored with faster fingertip motion and lower forces. Estimated dynamic friction was negatively correlated with perceived slipperiness but not roughness. At the same time perceived roughness was strongly related to vibrations in the force, indicating distinct physical bases for these perceptual dimensions. These results show that humans actively tailor contact mechanics to perceptual goals during active exploration, supporting a sensorimotor account of texture perception. SO_SCPLOWIGNIFICANCEC_SCPLOWO_SCPCAP C_SCPCAPO_SCPLOWSTATEMENTC_SCPLOWTouch is usually studied as if the skin passively receives information, but in everyday life we actively move and press against objects to recognize them and learn what they feel like. This study measured both fingertip motion and contact forces while people freely explored textures and judged hardness, slipperiness, and roughness - the three of the most salient dimensions of tactile experience. The results show that people adjust how they move and press depending on what they want to perceive, and that different physical signals - friction and vibration - support different texture judgments. This work helps explain touch as an active sensorimotor process, with implications for neuroscience, haptics, robotics, and neuroprosthetics.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
18.1%
2
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
11.6%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.4%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.7%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.2%
6
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
7
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
11
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.6%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
14
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
15
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
16
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.7%
18
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
20
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
22
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
23
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
25
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
Neuroscience of Consciousness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%