Back

Ecological inference and contaminant detection from fungal microbiome data with q2-fungal-traits

Lavrinienko, A.; Risch, V.; Tang, C.; Meyer, A.; Flörl, L.; Bokulich, N. A.

2026-06-17 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.17.732913 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fungi are key members of microbial communities, yet microbiome surveys often lack trait-based information required for ecologically meaningful interpretation of mycobiome data. To demonstrate the value of fungal trait-based phenotyping in microbiome research, we re-analyzed N=3,221 samples across four case studies spanning human, agricultural, and environmental systems. In human cancer and vineyard datasets, trait-based analysis detected fungi producing macroscopic fruiting bodies, likely introduced via airborne spore dispersal, indicating widespread contributions of transient or contaminant fungi that can confound interpretation of sequencing data from tumor biopsies and grape berries. In sourdough fermentations, filamentous fungi were highly abundant alongside traditionally-recognized yeast and occupied distinct ecological niches. In forest soils, increasing habitat disturbance was associated with increased prevalence and abundance of plant pathogens, and a marked decline in ectomycorrhizal and lichenized fungi. These changes were accompanied by a shift toward large-spored taxa in urban soils, consistent with enhanced stress tolerance. To facilitate broader adoption of fungal phenotyping in microbiome studies, we introduce q2-fungal-traits, a QIIME2 plugin for automated integration of fungal taxonomy derived from marker-gene or shotgun metagenome sequencing surveys with ecological and functional trait data. The plugin assigns lifestyle-related traits and spore size estimates through hierarchical taxonomic matching and integrates directly into standard microbiome workflows. Our case studies demonstrate that integrating trait-based ecology with mycobiota datasets can generate novel findings and testable hypotheses, enabling inference of the functional (ir)relevance of community constituents. Our work contributes to bridging the gap between descriptive community profiling and functional ecology in microbiome research.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.0%
2
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.3%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.6%
4
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.7%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
7
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.2%
8
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.3%
11
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.3%
12
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.7%
14
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.6%
16
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Environmental Microbiome
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
22
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.8%
24
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
27
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%
29
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
30
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%