Back

HTS-Oracle X: AI-Guided Prospective Discovery of Small Molecule Immune Checkpoint Binders

Abdel-Rahman, S.; Gabr, M.

2026-06-22 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.17.732853 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Targeting immune checkpoint protein-protein interactions (PPIs) using small molecules remains limited by the shallow, featureless binding surfaces of co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory receptors and the characteristically low hit rates of conventional high-throughput screening against these interfaces. Here we report HTS-Oracle X, a multimodal deep learning platform that integrates bidirectional cross-attention fusion of ChemBERTa SMILES embeddings with extended RDKit descriptors, trains on continuous biophysical binding signals rather than binary labels, and employs Monte Carlo Dropout uncertainty quantification for uncertainty-adjusted compound selection. Trained on 45,760 Dianthus TRIC-screened compounds per target under scaffold-aware cross-validation, HTS-Oracle X was applied prospectively to a 100,160-compound Enamine library against CD28, TIM-3, and VISTA. From 150 model-selected compounds, 45 dose-response confirmed binders were identified (30.0% overall hit rate), yielding enrichment factors of 234-408x over experimentally established random prospective baselines and 16 sub-micromolar hits. The top hits, HX-CD28-1 (KD = 233 nM), HX-TIM3-1 (KD = 249 nM), and HX-VISTA-1 (KD = 345 nM), demonstrated on-target functional activity in immune cell and tumor co-culture assays. HTSOracle X represents a scalable AI-guided framework for small molecule discovery against non-enzymatic immune checkpoint targets. Table of Contents artwork O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=115 SRC="FIGDIR/small/732853v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (47K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@187fac7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6150d7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10266f0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b436e1_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.9%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.1%
3
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
4
mAbs
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
5
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
6
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 19%
2.9%
8
Journal of Cheminformatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
9
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
11
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
77 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
13
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
15
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
16
Cell Chemical Biology
94 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
17
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
18
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.5%
20
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.5%
21
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
22
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
23
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
24
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
25
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
27
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
28
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
30
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%