Back

Extending the osmophobic effect to protein side chains with a unified transfer model across osmolyte classes

Pereira, A. F.; Araujo, J. O.; Tarraga, W.; Martinez, L.

2026-06-21 biophysics
10.64898/2026.06.17.732849 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding the role of the protein backbone and side chains on cosolvent-induced stabilization is essential for a molecular picture of osmolyte action. The dominant view has been that protecting osmolytes stabilize proteins primarily through unfavorable interactions with the peptide backbone - the osmophobic effect - with side chains playing a minor or opposing role. By revisiting the decomposition of amino acid transfer free energies with proper account of the mutual shielding between backbone and side-chain groups, we derive a transfer model that is consistent with experimental denaturation m-values for urea and protecting osmolytes simultaneously - a feat neither the established nor the previously proposed universal-backbone models could achieve alone. A mechanism-dependent interpretation of backbone accessibility is proposed: geometric for excluded cosolvents, complete for binders where cosolvent-backbone interactions are specific. The model reveals that for all strong protecting osmolytes, including TMAO, sarcosine, sucrose, trehalose, and sorbitol, both backbone and side chains contribute favorably to protein stabilization, with side-chain contributions comparable to or exceeding those of the backbone. For urea, the model recovers the known balanced backbone and side-chain contributions to denaturation when the directional nature of urea-backbone hydrogen bonding is accounted for, which makes the backbone accessible to urea regardless of side-chain shielding. Weaker protectants such as proline, betaine, and glycerol are distinguished by competing backbone and side-chain effects that partially cancel. These results extend the osmophobic effect to protein side chains and establish a three-tier classification of osmolyte action: cooperative backbone and side-chain stabilization, cooperative destabilization, and competing contributions. The greater sensitivity of the model predictions to side-chain composition provides avenues for experimental validation of the underlying physical assumptions and for protein engineering.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
12.8%
2
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.8%
3
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.8%
4
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.8%
5
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 12%
4.3%
7
Biomacromolecules
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.0%
9
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
JACS Au
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.8%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
13
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
16
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Langmuir
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
21
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
22
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
23
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
The Journal of Chemical Physics
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
27
Biophysical Reports
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%