Back

Low-input proteomics enables proteome and phosphoproteome-scale molecular phenotyping of separase-deficient oocytes

Touati, S.;Legros, V.;Boyer, J.;Cochard, V.;Chevreux, G.;Wassmann, K.

2026-06-21 Cell Biology
10.64898/2026.06.17.732846 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We performed a comprehensive quantitative proteomic analysis of mouse oocytes using as few as 40 oocytes per condition, comparing wild-type and separase knockout oocytes at metaphase I and metaphase II. To this end, we generated a deep proteomic library spanning oocyte cell cycle stages, enabling the identification of numerous phosphosites without phosphopeptide enrichment. We further combined data-dependent (DDA) and data-independent (DIA) acquisition strategies, analyzed through multiple software pipelines in both library-based and library-free modes. Our results reveal extensive proteome remodeling during the metaphase I to metaphase II transition in wild-type oocytes, consistent with dynamic regulation of meiotic processes. As a proof of concept for our workflow, we asked whether separase knockout oocytes--unable to separate chromosomes in meiosis I--progress into meiosis II. Direct comparison of wild-type and separase knockout oocytes at the metaphase II stage revealed minimal global differences, supporting the idea that both conditions converge toward a comparable metaphase II-like cellular state despite distinct chromosomal configurations. However, at a finer scale, specific alterations were detected among chromosome-associated proteins. Notably, Meikin was enriched in separase-deficient metaphase II oocytes, consistent with defective separase-dependent cleavage and subsequent turnover. More broadly, several proteins involved in chromosome organization displayed behavior similar to Meikin, suggesting that separase activity regulates multiple substrates to orchestrate chromosome segregation during female meiosis.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 8%
18.6%
2
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
3
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
4
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.5%
6
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.2%
7
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
9
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
10
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
11
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
14
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.1%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.0%
17
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.0%
19
PROTEOMICS
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.8%
21
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
23
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.6%
24
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%