Back

Modelling and Inferring Large-scale Demographic Fluctuations in Structured Populations Through Simulations and PSMC-based Methods.

Steux, C.; Vishwakarma, R.; Sgarlata, G. M.; Mazet, O.; Tournebize, R.; Thebaud, C.; Goossens, B.; Chikhi, L.

2026-06-22 genomics
10.64898/2026.06.17.732814 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The climatic oscillations of the Quaternary have likely affected the demographic history of many species, and PSMC (Pairwise Sequentially Markovian Coalescent) has been widely used to investigate these histories. However, it is increasingly acknowledged that PSMC trajectories are difficult to interpret. First, they are influenced by connectivity changes, even without population size changes. Second, most PSMC curves exhibit a few humps when tens of cycles occurred during the Pleistocene. Finally, responses to ancient habitat change have been shown to be species-specific. To address these issues, we simulated structured populations where connectivity (or population size and connectivity) varied according to successive interglacial and glacial periods during the last 2.6 million years. We computed the IICR (Inverse Instantaneous Coalescence Rate), the function that PSMC estimates, and ran PSMC. We further varied the generation length and assumed that some species were positively or negatively affected by glacials. We found that the IICR carries information regarding the demographic oscillations, but that PSMC fails to recover it for times older than 300 ky. For the last 200 ky, PSMC was often able to reproduce qualitatively the demographic oscillations. We also tested SNIF (Structured Non-stationary Inferential Framework), which produced good results using the IICR curve as an input but not when using the PSMC curve. Altogether, our study suggests that the humps older than 300 ky in PSMC histories are unlikely to represent trends of population size or connectivity. However, improving the estimation of the IICR could potentially help reconstruct some of these past demographic changes.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.7%
2
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.6%
3
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.6%
4
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 7%
5.3%
7
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.7%
13
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
14
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
15
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
16
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
18
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
19
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
20
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
22
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
25
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
26
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
27
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
28
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.6%