Back

Distributed representations of chemosensory valence in a naive vertebrate brain

Jenkins, B.; Frank, T.

2026-06-22 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.17.732810 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chemical cues guide essential behaviors by signaling food, danger, and social information. A major dimension of chemosensory processing is valence, which biases animals toward approach or avoidance, yet its brain-wide organization in vertebrates remains unclear. Here, we used larval zebrafish to map neuronal activity associated with behaviorally defined appetitive and aversive chemosensory cues. Free-swimming assays identified a chemically diverse stimulus panel that elicited robust approach or avoidance, and key valence-dependent motor signatures were preserved during partially immobilized two-photon Ca{superscript 2} imaging with simultaneous tail tracking. Brain-wide activity revealed partly distinct patterns of stimulus identity, valence-related activity, and movement-correlated neuronal recruitment. Stimulus identity was strongest in the olfactory bulb and pallium, whereas small, coordinated valence-related populations were distributed across multiple telencephalic and diencephalic regions. These populations were partly separable from movement-correlated neurons, especially in forebrain regions, but showed valence-specific, opposing relationships with motor output. Together, our findings show that chemosensory valence-related activity in a naive vertebrate brain is not confined to a single sensory or motor-associated region, but is organized across a distributed, regionally structured brain-wide architecture. HIGHLIGHTSNaive larval zebrafish show appetitive and aversive chemosensory behaviors that are preserved during imaging Chemosensory stimuli evoke widespread brain activity, revealing distributed stimulus identity and valence representations Valence-encoding neurons form small, coordinated populations across multiple forebrain regions Valence-related activity is partly separable from movement-correlated activity

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.