Back

BioBrain: A Multi-Agent Framework for Natural Language Driven Quantitative Microscopy Data Analysis

Tsolakidis, K.; Breuer, A.; Bender, S. W. B.; Margaritaki, S.; Dreisler, M. W.; Oikonomou, A.; Hatzakis, N. S.

2026-06-21 biophysics
10.64898/2026.06.17.732700 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Advances in fluorescence microscopy have dramatically expanded the range of biological questions that can be addressed, enabling quantitative observations of molecular interactions and cellular dynamics with unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution. However, the growing complexity of imaging data has outpaced our ability to analyze them. Despite numerous computational methods exist, they often rely on specialized software environments, heterogeneous data formats, and technical expertise, limiting adoption and widening the gap between data acquisition and quantitative biological interpretation. Here we introduce BioBrain, a multi-agent framework that translates natural-language analytical goals into executable and reproducible microscopy analysis pipelines. Instead of generating analysis code, BioBrain assembles validated analytical methods and can expands its analytical capabilities by integrating existing laboratory scripts into a unified conversational framework. Every selected method and inferred parameter is transparently reported, ensuring traceable and reproducible analyses. On two-channel total internal reflection fluorescence and three-dimensional lattice light-sheet benchmarks, BioBrain exactly reproduces expert-derived results when parameters are specified and degrades predictably and traceably when they are not, while frontier language models generated large, model-dependent quantitative errors despite completing without warning. BioBrain offers a practical path for closing the widening gap between data acquisition and biological discovery, enabling experimental scientists to communicate with computational analysis in the language of biology rather than the language of software.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.1%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.2%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.5%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
8
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
11
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
12
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
13
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
14
Biophysical Reports
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
15
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
16
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
18
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
21
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
23
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.6%
24
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
26
IUCrJ
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%