Back

The atypical IκB factor IκBδ enhances CD8 T cell accumulation and effector functions in solid tumors

Dash, B.; He, X.; Lara-Custodio, A.; Arteaga-Vazquez, L. J.; Zhao, Y.; Drum, H.; Ikeda, O.; Johnson, E.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Battu, S.; Gonzalez-Avalos, E.; Rao, A.; Hogan, P. G.

2026-06-19 immunology
10.64898/2026.06.17.732005 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Two prominent mechanisms by which tumors fend off immune control are by constraining the ability of T cells and CAR T cells to survive and expand in the tumor, and by restraining their ability to sustain full cytotoxic capacity. We identified I{kappa}B{delta}, encoded by Nfkbid, a poorly characterized I{kappa}B family member, as a molecular lever that overcomes both of these constraints on anti-tumor CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Nfkbid is an NFAT target gene that is expressed in CD8+ effector T cells and, at modest levels, in CD8+ TILs. We found that Nfkbid depletion impaired TIL accumulation, exacerbating the growth of solid tumors. On the other hand, ectopic I{kappa}B{delta} overexpression enhanced TIL expansion, reduced the expression of exhaustion-associated transcription factors and inhibitory receptors, and elevated cytotoxic molecule production, leading to enhanced tumor control. I{kappa}B{delta} has a shorter protein isoform that is identical in a core region spanning the ankyrin-repeat domain known to interact with NF{kappa}B proteins, but that lacks the [~]150-residue N-terminal region. We showed that the shared core region is sufficient to drive T cell accumulation, whereas the N-terminal peptide region is required for robust effector function and to counter exhaustion, underscoring that tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cell accumulation and effector differentiation are separable programs. Our current study provides evidence that I{kappa}B{delta}, an atypical member of the NF{kappa}B family, is a lever to overcome two cardinal deficits that limit CD8+ TIL anti-tumor efficacy: impaired accumulation in the tumor and diminished effector function.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
15.1%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.9%
3
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.9%
4
The Journal of Immunology
166 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.9%
5
Science Signaling
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
6
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 10%
5.2%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.1%
9
Nature Immunology
79 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
10
Journal of Experimental Medicine
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.2%
11
Cancer Immunology Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
12
Science Immunology
88 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.8%
13
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
14
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.7%
15
The EMBO Journal
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Oncogene
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Immunity
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
19
Cell Communication and Signaling
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.8%
22
European Journal of Immunology
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%
24
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.6%
25
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%
26
OncoImmunology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
27
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.6%
29
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%