Back

Beyond mean trabecular separation: decomposing metaphyseal marrow space into local trabecular spacing and marrow cavity expansion

Huesa, C.; Lockhart, J. C.; Goodyear, C. S.; Williams, J. A.

2026-06-18 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.17.729075 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Micro-computed tomography ({micro}CT) is widely used to assess trabecular bone microarchitecture, with trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) among the core parameters recommended for reporting. Tb.Sp is typically expressed as a single volume-weighted mean derived from maximal sphere fitting, although the underlying distribution of local separation values is rarely examined. Here, we show that Tb.Sp distributions in metaphyseal trabecular bone are frequently non-Gaussian and bimodal or multimodal. Using {micro}CT datasets from three established models of osteoporosis, spinal cord injury (SCI), ovariectomy (OVX), and ageing, we demonstrate that this behaviour is most evident in metaphyseal trabecular bone and is less apparent in epiphyseal trabecular bone or trabecular thickness distributions. We further show that multimodal metaphyseal Tb.Sp distributions correspond to two spatially distinct contributions within the marrow space: lower-diameter local separation within the residual trabecular network, and higher-diameter regions associated with larger contiguous marrow cavities. Based on this observation, we introduce a simple extension to standard morphometric analysis in which Tb.Sp is decomposed into local trabecular separation (Tb.SpL) and marrow cavity separation (Tb.SpM). Tb.Sp decomposition revealed model-specific patterns of trabecular deterioration. SCI was characterised predominantly by increased Tb.SpM, consistent with expansion of larger marrow cavities, whereas OVX showed a more subtle or distributed alteration. Ageing showed changes in both Tb.SpL and Tb.SpM, with the higher-diameter component becoming most prominent in older animals. Together, these findings demonstrate that mean Tb.Sp can mask structurally distinct forms of metaphyseal marrow-space organisation and support reporting distributional descriptors, and where appropriate Tb.SpL and Tb.SpM, alongside conventional Tb.Sp.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bone
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.8%
2
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.5%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.3%
6
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
7
JBMR Plus
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.5%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
10
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.1%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
23
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%