Back

Sequential Deep Learning to Predict Non-Central to Central Geographic Atrophy Progression from OCT Imaging

Siraz, S.; Kamanda, H.; Nabil, A. S.; Gholami, S.; Rao, N. T.; Ong, S. S.; Alam, M.

2026-06-22 ophthalmology
10.64898/2026.06.17.26355882 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate a temporal deep learning framework for predicting geographic atrophy (GA) progression across multi-year horizons using longitudinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) sequences. Design: Retrospective longitudinal cohort study. Subjects, Participants, and/or Controls: A total of 91 patients with dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) were identified from Wake Forest University School of Medicine (2013-2023), yielding 455 OCT volumes. Two prediction cohorts were defined: 32 patients with no GA (NGA) at baseline who subsequently developed GA, and 35 patients whose earliest GA manifestation was non-central GA (NCGA). Non-progressing patients served as negative controls. Methods: OCT B-scan volumes were encoded into visit-level feature representations using three pretrained architectures (ResNet-18, ResNet-50, ViT-B/16). Chronologically ordered visit embeddings, optionally augmented with inter-visit time intervals ({Delta}t), were processed through recurrent neural networks (RNN), long short-term memory networks (LSTM), and Transformer encoders to model longitudinal disease trajectories. Models were trained and evaluated independently for prediction horizons of 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 years using patient-level stratified splits (80/20). Performance was assessed across five random seeds. Main Outcome Measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), F1-score, and accuracy for predicting two clinically critical transitions: NGA to GA onset and NCGA to central GA (CGA) involvement. Results: For NGA to GA prediction, models achieved ROC-AUC of 0.84-0.94 at 2-4 years and 1.00 at 5-6 years. For NCGA to CGA prediction, Transformer-based models achieved peak AUC of 0.95 at 4 years and 0.96 at 5 years. Longer input sequences (8 visits vs. 4 visits) consistently improved NCGA to CGA performance at extended horizons. Temporal interval encoding improved stability in several LSTM configurations.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.2%
2
Translational Vision Science & Technology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
4
Ophthalmology Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.4%
6
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.3%
8
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
9
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
10
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
11
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
12
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
13
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
14
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
16
Experimental Eye Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
17
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
18
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
19
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
21
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
22
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
23
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
24
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
Stem Cell Reports
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Genetic Epidemiology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
27
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%