Stroboscopic Light Stimulation in Adults Reporting Depressive Symptoms: Safety, Tolerability, Feasibility, and Active-Comparator Development in a Staged Early-Phase Study
Nacker, D.; Kalus, L.; Seth, A. K.; Stone, J. M.; Lawson, G.; Simpson, J.; Sander, J. W.; bremner, s.; Jones, C. I.; Wood, W.; Macpherson, F.; Proeckl, D.; Winkler, E.; Schwartzman, D. J.
Show abstract
Stroboscopic light stimulation (SLS) is a candidate non-pharmacological intervention that induces transient visual and affective experiences, with potential application in depression. Before efficacy testing, clinical development requires safety, tolerability and feasibility data. We report a staged, single-site programme in adults reporting depressive symptoms. Work Package (WP) 1 tested 11 SLS parameter sets for safety and tolerability. An interim bridge study assessed whether a low-phenomenology SLS control reduced subjective visual effects while preserving session context. WP2 randomised 84 participants to four weekly supervised 31-minute sessions of the intervention or a low-phenomenology control. In WP1, 31 participants were analysed; no severe adverse reactions occurred, mean discomfort was low (0.49/10), and the highest session-level upper 80% confidence limit was 1.13/10, well below the prespecified threshold. The interim study supported experiential separation between intervention and control. In WP2, endpoint data were available for 70/84 participants (83.3%): 39/42 in the intervention arm and 31/42 in the control arm. Overall retention met the criterion, but lower control-arm retention remains a design issue; protocol adherence was high, discomfort remained low, and no serious SLS-attributable adverse events occurred. Exploratory depressive-symptom changes suggested a possible BDI-II signal, but do not establish efficacy. Supervised SLS met key safety, tolerability, and feasibility criteria, and a lower visual-phenomenology active control can be carried forward, while masking and comparator credibility remain to be established. The next step is a diagnostically defined, CTU-governed Phase 2a feasibility trial that pre-registers a locked protocol and tests masking, credibility, retention and endpoint precision.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-blaming emotions in major depression: a randomised pilot trial comparing fMRI neurofeedback training with self-guided psychological strategies (NeuroMooD) 93%
- Emotional recognition training modifies neural response to emotional faces but does not improve mood in healthy volunteers with high levels of depressive symptoms 92%
- A computational approach to understanding effort-based decision-making in depression 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Depression is Associated with Treatment Response Trajectories in Adults with Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Machine Learning Analysis 94%
- Clinical Presentation of Psychotic Experiences in Patients with Common Mental Disorders Attending the UK Primary Care Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) Programme 92%
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote virtual reality assessment elucidates self-blame-related action tendencies in depression 92%
- Heterogeneity in COVID-19 Pandemic-Induced Lifestyle Stressors and Predicts Future Mental Health in Adults and Children in the US and UK 91%
- Estimating heterogeneity of treatment effect in psychiatric clinical trials 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sequential Bilateral Accelerated Theta Burst Stimulation in Adolescents With Suicidal Ideation Associated With Major Depressive Disorder: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- Investigating psychobiological causes and mechanisms in functional seizures and functional motor symptoms: Study protocol 93%
- STIMULATE-ICP: A pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster randomised trial of an integrated care pathway with a nested, Phase III, open label, adaptive platform randomised drug trial in individuals with Long COVID: a structured protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-session intervention with and without video support to prevent the worsening of emotional distress among healthcare workers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a randomized clinical trial 95%
- The development and validation of a prognostic model to predict relapse in adults with remitted depression in primary care: secondary analysis of pooled individual participant data from multiple studies 92%
- Living alone and mental health: parallel analyses in longitudinal population surveys and electronic health records prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.