Back

Stroboscopic Light Stimulation in Adults Reporting Depressive Symptoms: Safety, Tolerability, Feasibility, and Active-Comparator Development in a Staged Early-Phase Study

Nacker, D.; Kalus, L.; Seth, A. K.; Stone, J. M.; Lawson, G.; Simpson, J.; Sander, J. W.; bremner, s.; Jones, C. I.; Wood, W.; Macpherson, F.; Proeckl, D.; Winkler, E.; Schwartzman, D. J.

2026-06-22 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.06.17.26355864 medRxiv
Show abstract

Stroboscopic light stimulation (SLS) is a candidate non-pharmacological intervention that induces transient visual and affective experiences, with potential application in depression. Before efficacy testing, clinical development requires safety, tolerability and feasibility data. We report a staged, single-site programme in adults reporting depressive symptoms. Work Package (WP) 1 tested 11 SLS parameter sets for safety and tolerability. An interim bridge study assessed whether a low-phenomenology SLS control reduced subjective visual effects while preserving session context. WP2 randomised 84 participants to four weekly supervised 31-minute sessions of the intervention or a low-phenomenology control. In WP1, 31 participants were analysed; no severe adverse reactions occurred, mean discomfort was low (0.49/10), and the highest session-level upper 80% confidence limit was 1.13/10, well below the prespecified threshold. The interim study supported experiential separation between intervention and control. In WP2, endpoint data were available for 70/84 participants (83.3%): 39/42 in the intervention arm and 31/42 in the control arm. Overall retention met the criterion, but lower control-arm retention remains a design issue; protocol adherence was high, discomfort remained low, and no serious SLS-attributable adverse events occurred. Exploratory depressive-symptom changes suggested a possible BDI-II signal, but do not establish efficacy. Supervised SLS met key safety, tolerability, and feasibility criteria, and a lower visual-phenomenology active control can be carried forward, while masking and comparator credibility remain to be established. The next step is a diagnostically defined, CTU-governed Phase 2a feasibility trial that pre-registers a locked protocol and tests masking, credibility, retention and endpoint precision.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.8%
2
Nature Protocols
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
3
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
4.0%
5
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
7
Journal of Psychiatric Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
8
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
11
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
12
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
14
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
17
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
22
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
23
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
24
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
26
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
27
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
28
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
29
BJPsych Open
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
30
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.1%