Frequency-dependent cognitive effects of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Meira, B.; Bastos, P.; Mendes Ferreira, V.; Albuquerque, J.; Magrico, M.; Lemos, R.; Barbosa, R.; Coelho, M.; Mendonca, M.
Show abstract
Background: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) improves levodopa-induced motor complications and cardinal motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD), but stimulation frequency may differentially shape outcomes. This is evident for axial and gait symptoms, which may respond differently to lower-frequency stimulation. Whether frequency-dependent effects extend to cognition remains unclear. Objective: To investigate the cognitive effects of DBS at distinct frequencies in PD. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO - CRD42024618253). PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched for studies assessing cognitive outcomes under different stimulation frequencies. Eight cognitive domains were defined: verbal fluency, cognitive flexibility, executive control, working memory, attention, processing speed, episodic memory, and time processing. Multilevel random-effects meta-analyses were performed, with effect sizes expressed as Hedges' g. Results: Forty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, the majority (n = 31) involving STN-DBS. Twenty-one STN-DBS studies, including 355 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with HFS ([≥] 130 Hz), lower frequencies (4-80 Hz) were associated with better verbal fluency (g = 0.27) and cognitive flexibility (g = 0.38), with consistent effects across sensitivity and leave-one-out analyses. Accuracy-based executive control measures also favored lower-frequency stimulation. OFF-stimulation comparisons showed a concordant pattern. Evidence for other targets (PPN and NBM) was limited. Conclusions: Lower-frequency STN-DBS was associated with modest benefits in specific cognitive domains compared with HFS. These findings highlight the need for future research to determine how frequency interacts with stimulation location and symptom-specific networks to shape cognitive and cognitive-motor outcomes in PD.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Optogenetic fMRI reveals therapeutic circuits of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation 94%
- Human Applications of Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation: A Systematic Review 93%
- Automated Deep Brain Stimulation programming based on electrode location – a randomized, cross-over trial using a data-driven algorithm 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Information processing speed modulation by electrical brain stimulation in multiple sclerosis: Towards individually-tailored protocols 94%
- Beta Burst-Driven Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Improves Gait Impairment and Freezing of Gait in Parkinson’s Disease 92%
- Neural pathway activation in the subthalamic region depends on stimulation polarity 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Shared pathway-specific network mechanisms of dopamine and deep brain stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson's disease 94%
- A human brain network linked to restoration of consciousness after deep brain stimulation 93%
- Toward a unified connectomic target for deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Propranolol reduces Parkinson’s tremor and inhibits tremor-related activity in the motor cortex: a placebo-controlled crossover trial 93%
- Differential cognitive effects of unilateral left and right subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease 93%
- Left prefrontal impact links subthalamic stimulation with depressive symptoms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Brain Stimulation for Epilepsy: Optimal Targeting and Clinical Outcomes 89%
- The effect of GLP-1RA exenatide on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Randomised Clinical Trial 87%
- Predicting disability progression and cognitive worsening in multiple sclerosis using grey matter network measures 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.