Back

Frequency-dependent cognitive effects of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Meira, B.; Bastos, P.; Mendes Ferreira, V.; Albuquerque, J.; Magrico, M.; Lemos, R.; Barbosa, R.; Coelho, M.; Mendonca, M.

2026-06-17 neurology
10.64898/2026.06.17.26355717 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) improves levodopa-induced motor complications and cardinal motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD), but stimulation frequency may differentially shape outcomes. This is evident for axial and gait symptoms, which may respond differently to lower-frequency stimulation. Whether frequency-dependent effects extend to cognition remains unclear. Objective: To investigate the cognitive effects of DBS at distinct frequencies in PD. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO - CRD42024618253). PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched for studies assessing cognitive outcomes under different stimulation frequencies. Eight cognitive domains were defined: verbal fluency, cognitive flexibility, executive control, working memory, attention, processing speed, episodic memory, and time processing. Multilevel random-effects meta-analyses were performed, with effect sizes expressed as Hedges' g. Results: Forty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, the majority (n = 31) involving STN-DBS. Twenty-one STN-DBS studies, including 355 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with HFS ([≥] 130 Hz), lower frequencies (4-80 Hz) were associated with better verbal fluency (g = 0.27) and cognitive flexibility (g = 0.38), with consistent effects across sensitivity and leave-one-out analyses. Accuracy-based executive control measures also favored lower-frequency stimulation. OFF-stimulation comparisons showed a concordant pattern. Evidence for other targets (PPN and NBM) was limited. Conclusions: Lower-frequency STN-DBS was associated with modest benefits in specific cognitive domains compared with HFS. These findings highlight the need for future research to determine how frequency interacts with stimulation location and symptom-specific networks to shape cognitive and cognitive-motor outcomes in PD.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Parkinson's Disease
105 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
11.6%
2
Movement Disorders
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
11.6%
3
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
6
Journal of Parkinson's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
7
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
9
Journal of Parkinson’s Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
10
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
13
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
17
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
Experimental Neurology
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
21
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.8%
23
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
25
Neurotherapeutics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%