Back

Caenorhabditis becei recombinant inbred lines (beRILs) reveal the scope of heritable variation within a gonochoristic nematode population.

Paree, T.; Salome Correa, J.; Caglar, D.; Jackson, J. L.; Martel, A.; Nguyen, T. H.; Vallance, S.; Rockman, M. V.

2026-06-21 genetics
10.64898/2026.06.16.732751 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Caenorhabditis nematodes are a powerful model clade for evolutionary genetics. Isogenic lines and panels of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) are among the most essential tools for genetic studies in these species. While most Caenorhabditis species are gonochoristic, large RIL panels have only been developed for self-fertilizing species. This gap biases our understanding and limits our ability to address questions related to the genetic architecture of traits in outbred populations, which have radically higher genetic diversity, heterozygosity, and effective recombination than selfers. Having previously identified Caenorhabditis becei as a tractable gonochoristic species due to its moderate inbreeding depression, we generated two panels of advanced-intercross RILs derived from three individual outbred C. becei worms collected from a single locality on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. One panel derives from a pair of worms sampled from a single rotting fig; the other derives from a cross between worms from two different figs. The panels share one founder in common, yielding two half-sib RIL panels. We sequenced and haplotyped the lines, identifying millions of variants and thousands of recombination breakpoints. Using simulations, we demonstrate the suitability of these lines for quantitative genetics studies and QTL mapping. In our single-fig panel, we observe abundant heritable variation in population growth rate, individual body size, and sexual dimorphism for body size. We detected four QTLs associated with population growth rate and show that estimated allelic effects are good predictors of selection that occurred during panel derivation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
17.8%
2
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.5%
3
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.4%
4
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.0%
5
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
7
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
8
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.1%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.0%
11
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
13
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
15
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.4%
17
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
18
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
20
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
22
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
23
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.0%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.6%