Back

Selective vulnerability of excitatory cortical neurons to ZMYND11 loss reveals cell-type-specific mechanisms of neurodevelopmental disorder risk

Chang, X.; McKinley, M.; Li, W.; Yang, I.; Albizzati, E.; Iwasawa, E.; Guo, F.; Shillington, A.; Tchieu, J.

2026-06-19 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.16.732737 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Excitation/inhibition (E:I) imbalance is a convergent mechanism in neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), yet whether NDD risk genes disrupt excitatory and inhibitory neurons through shared or distinct molecular programs remains poorly understood. Using human pluripotent stem cell-derived cortical projection and medial ganglionic eminence-like inhibitory neurons, we show that loss-of-function mutations in the chromatin reader ZMYND11 produce cell-type-selective vulnerability in cortical excitatory neurons. ZMYND11-deficient excitatory neurons exhibit hyperexcitability accompanied by de-repression of BMP signaling, dysregulation of glutamate receptor expression, and a shift toward non-brain splicing isoforms, whereas these molecular signatures are largely absent in ZMYND11-deficient inhibitory neurons. This cell-type selectivity is associated with differential upregulation of RBFOX family splicing regulators. Structure-function analysis reveals that MYND domain is required for normal progenitor dynamics and neuronal excitability. Together, these findings indicate that E:I imbalance in ZMYND11-associated NDD arises primarily from cell-type-selective vulnerability of excitatory cortical projection neurons and identify MYND domain as a critical determinant of neuronal function. HighlightsO_LIZMYND11-deficient excitatory neurons (ExNs) show hyperexcitability. C_LIO_LIAltered BMP signaling & glutamate receptor levels are implicated in mutant ExNs. C_LIO_LIInhibitory neurons show attenuated response to ZMYND11 loss. C_LIO_LIThe MYND domain in ZMYND11 is a critical regulator of neuronal excitability. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.