Back

A rapid, field-deployable paper-based biosensor for the detection of African swine fever virus in whole blood

Raut, B.; Palla, G.; Rafiq, N.; Wang, J.; Kumar, V.; Kamel, M. S.; Nguyen, D. V.; Lanka, S.; Maddox, C. W.; Ragland, D.; Pasternak, J. A.; Verma, M. S.

2026-06-17 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.16.732725 bioRxiv
Show abstract

African swine fever virus (ASFV) poses a major transboundary threat to global swine production, underscoring the need for rapid and field-deployable diagnostic tools. Although quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based assays are the standard molecular assay for ASFV detection, their reliance on centralized laboratory infrastructure, multi-step sample preparation, and trained personnel limit their utility for timely decision-making at the point of need (PON). Here, we report a portable molecular diagnostic platform that enables colorimetric quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification (qLAMP) directly from diluted whole blood on microfluidic paper-based analytical devices ({micro}PADs). The assay targets the conserved ASFV viral protein 72 (VP72) and topoisomerase II (TOPII) genes and incorporates objective image-based colorimetric signal analysis to reduce user-dependent interpretation. Using plasmid DNA spiked into whole blood diluted to 5% (v/v) in 5% D-mannitol, the {micro}PAD-LAMP assay achieved a limit of detection (LOD) of 25 copies per reaction (67 copies/{micro}L of whole blood sample) for VP72 targets with no observed cross-reactivity against nine common swine pathogens, demonstrating 100% analytical sensitivity and specificity during in-house testing and 90% and 92% analytical sensitivity and specificity respectively in an external laboratory evaluation. The complete assay was performed within 60 minutes using a portable heating and imaging platform. Together, these results demonstrate a simple, DNA extraction-free molecular diagnostic approach that enables rapid and reliable ASFV detection from whole blood applicable to field-relevant conditions.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.3%
3
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.6%
4
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.8%
5
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.6%
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.6%
7
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
8
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
10
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
11
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
12
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
16
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Journal of Clinical Virology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
22
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Talanta
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
25
The Analyst
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
28
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.6%
29
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
ACS Sensors
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%