Back

Analysis of the off-target interaction of amyloid PET tracers with human brain sulfotransferases

Miccoli, L.; Fullone, R.; Delli Pizzi, S.; Tomaiuolo, F.; Sensi, S. L.; Floresta, G.; Granzotto, A.

2026-06-21 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.16.732640 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) tracers targeting amyloid-{beta} (A{beta}) are central to the diagnosis and staging of Alzheimers disease (AD). However, growing evidence indicates that these tracers can engage off-target molecules, complicating signal interpretation. Sulfotransferases (SULTs) have been experimentally identified as binding partners of 11C-Pittsburgh Compound-B (PiB). However, whether the clinically used fluorinated PiB derivatives flutemetamol and flutafuranol interact with brain-expressed SULTs is yet unexplored. Here, we combined multi-omic transcriptomic profiling with molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to assess the structural interactions of SULT-tracer complexes. Analysis of the Genotype-Tissue Expression project and the Human Protein Atlas identified SULT1A1, SULT1A3, and SULT4A1 as the SULT isoforms predominantly expressed in the human brain. Docking and MD simulations showed that all three tracers form energetically comparable complexes within the catalytic pockets of these isoforms, yet their dynamic stability varied in an enzyme- and tracer-specific manner. PiB and flutemetamol were stably accommodated in SULT1A1, but PiB lost its initial pose in SULT4A1. Flutafuranol showed weaker binding in SULT1A1, yet formed stable complexes in SULT1A3 and SULT4A1. Notably, SULT1A1, SULT1A3, and SULT4A1 are all expressed in the cerebellum, the brain region used as a reference for A{beta} PET signal normalization. These findings provide a structural framework for off-target tracer interaction with brain SULTs and suggest that the intracellular enzymatic environment may contribute to variability in A{beta} PET signals beyond fibrillar A{beta} deposition.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.7%
2
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
3
Alzheimer's & Dementia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
6
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
7
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
8
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 9%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.5%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.3%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.2%
12
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
13
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
JACS Au
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.7%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
17
Neurobiology of Aging
107 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
Acta Neuropathologica
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
21
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
89 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.8%
25
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
Translational Neurodegeneration
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
Theranostics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%