Back

Phytoplasma mediated transcriptional changes in poinsettia buds suggest MAF3 and bZIP67 transcription factors as potential suppressors of shoot branching

Darbani, B.;Ingvardsen, C.;Holme, I.;Moller, M.;Graff, J.;Brinch-Pedersen, H.;Nicolaisen, M.

2026-06-17 Plant Biology
10.64898/2026.06.16.732632 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIShoot branching is critical not only in breeding for yield but also for ornamentals architecture. In the ornamental plant poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima), shoot branching has traditionally been induced by phytoplasma (Candidatus Phytoplasma pruni) inoculation. This study aimed to identify regulatory genes that could be leveraged in future breeding-by-genetic engineering efforts to develop phytoplasma-free, branching poinsettia plants. C_LIO_LITo elucidate mechanisms of phytoplasma-induced shoot branching, we performed RNA-sequencing and assembled an axillary bud-specific transcriptome for expression analyses in phytoplasma-infected and -free poinsettia. Phenotyping and RNA-sequencing were also conducted on Arabidopsis mutants and wild-type lines to investigate the transcriptional regulatory effects of candidate genes. C_LIO_LIThe transcription factors EpMAF3 and EpbZIP67 were highly de-regulated in phytoplasma-infected poinsettia. We also found a two-fold increase in primary-stem branching levels of the Arabidopsis maf3 and bzip67 mutants, suggesting the two transcription factors as potential shoot branching suppressors. AtTcp1, a CYC-clade TCP transcription factor, was up-regulated (78x) in leaves of the maf3 mutants. Analyzing previously reported protein-level interactions for the differentially expressed genes (e.g., AtClamt, AtGh3.9/3.15, AtSaur32/36, AtAbi3, AtGamt2, AtTcp3, and AtDwf4) in bzip67 mutants shed light on other shoot branching regulators such as TCPs, PINs, ABIs, DWARF14, and BES1, highlighting two regulatory sub-networks including membrane transport and hormonal signaling. C_LIO_LIThe results open the way to rational engineering of shoot branching in poinsettia by targeted mutagenesis of MAF3 and bZIP67. In that way, the tedious and viral-infection prone process of phytoplasma inoculation can be avoided and poinsettia plants would have more homogenous branching. C_LI One-sentence summaryPhytoplasma infection in poinsettia induces bud-specific repression of the transcription factors EpMaf3 and EpbZip67, consistent with the enhanced stem branching observed in Arabidopsis maf3 and bzip67 mutant lines.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
11.7%
2
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.4%
3
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
4
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
5
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Plant Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
8
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.1%
9
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
11
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.3%
13
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
14
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
16
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
18
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
19
DNA Research
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
23
Molecular Plant
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
25
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
26
Molecular Plant Pathology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Plant and Cell Physiology
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%