Back

A biological spike-in enables cost-effective multi-species RNA-seq and reveals global transcriptional collapse under dark stress

Tan, S.;Lee, J.;Li, Y.;BOON, C.;Mutwil, M.

2026-06-16 Plant Biology
10.64898/2026.06.16.732598 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is the workhorse of plant functional genomics, but its per-sample cost limits the number of species, conditions and replicates that can be assayed, and its standard normalization assumes that most genes do not change and that total cellular RNA is roughly constant. Both assumptions fail when a treatment globally reprograms transcription. Here we address both problems at once. We pooled carefully weighed frozen tissue from three phylogenetically distant species, Arabidopsis thaliana (A), Brachypodium distachyon (B) and Oldenlandia corymbosa (O), into single RNA-seq libraries, applying a six-day dark stress to A and B while including unstressed O in every pool as an internal biological spike-in. Reads were mapped to a concatenated three-species coding-sequence index. Read assignment was essentially clean: every pure library was [≥]99.8 % correctly assigned and cross-species mis-mapping was [≤]0.2 %, establishing that pooling does not compromise species-level quantification. Because equal mass, not equal RNA, was pooled, the read share captured by the unchanging O reported the global RNA content of the stressed species directly: dark stress reduced total mRNA to [~]50-60 % of control in Arabidopsis and to only [~]25-37 % in Brachypodium, a magnitude difference invisible to conventional analysis. At the gene level, standard per-species analysis returned a balanced set of up- and down-regulated genes, whereas spike-in normalization revealed a response dominated by repression. Conventional pathway enrichment, measured against the bulk transcriptome, likewise failed to register the global shift. Multi-species multiplexing with a biological spike-in is therefore a cheap, quantitatively faithful strategy for stress transcriptomics.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.