Back

Whole-proteome structure/function prediction in Uropathogenic E. coli reveals previously missed host-microbe and microbe-phage interaction pathways

Peng, C.; Schreiber, H.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Q.; Hultgren, S. J.; Freddolino, L.

2026-06-16 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.16.732597 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The rapid advancement of high-throughput sequencing technologies has vastly increased the number of known protein sequences, but the experimental characterization of their structures and functions lags behind. This gap in knowledge impedes our understanding of biological mechanisms of these proteins, hinders the interpretation of high-throughput experiments, and exposes a significant challenge in modern biology: deducing the structural and functional information of proteins based on their sequences. Most computational approaches rely on homology with well-annotated proteins, yet many proteins lack identifiable homologues, reducing the power of this approach. Here, we integrated cutting-edge protein structure and function prediction methods to develop a complete sequence-structure-function pipeline that predicts structures and functions based on primary sequences. We applied this pipeline to predict the structure and function of all proteins in Escherichia coli UTI89, a model strain of uropathogenic E. coli. Based on the predicted functions, we performed enrichment analysis on the whole genome and revealed the possible roles and related biological mechanisms of poorly annotated proteins in this organism. Moreover, the performance of our pipeline was further validated through detailed case studies of the UTI89_C0931 and ybtS genes. Finally, we compiled the UTI89 structure and function database (https://seq2fun.dcmb.med.umich.edu/UTI89), offering it as a community resource to aid researchers in elucidating the roles of unannotated proteins in uropathogenic E. coli. This database aims to bridge critical knowledge gaps in microbial pathogenicity and resistance, enhancing our capacity to tackle emerging health threats.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Bacteriology
212 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.5%
2
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
9.5%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.5%
4
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.0%
5
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.3%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 10%
5.0%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.7%
8
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.1%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
11
microLife
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
13
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 16%
2.3%
14
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.0%
16
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
18
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
19
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.6%
20
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.4%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
22
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
23
Journal of Structural Biology: X
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
25
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
27
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%