Back

Complex-valued representations of time-series gene expression profiles for network analysis

Sun, J.; Cao, W.; Ikumi, K.; Shimizu, K. K.; Sese, J.

2026-06-22 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.16.732574 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Time-series RNA sequencing provides a powerful framework for studying dynamic gene regulation, yet conventional analyses usually represent gene expression profiles as real-valued vectors in Euclidean space and quantify similarity using correlation or distance. Inspired by quantum information theory, we present a framework for encoding time-series gene expression profiles as complex-valued vectors comprising amplitude and phase components in Hilbert space. We designed multiple encoding models to represent gene expression in the amplitude of complex-valued vectors, encode temporal differences in the phase, and extend the phase representation to incorporate the direction of local expression changes. Gene-gene similarity was then quantified using fidelity, which measures the overlap between two encoded vectors. Evaluation using time-series RNA-seq datasets across diverse species and biological contexts showed that different encoding models produced distinct fidelity distributions that were related to, but distinct from, conventional correlation measures. We then constructed gene-gene networks using pairwise fidelity values and detected communities containing genes with similar temporal profiles. Although fidelity distributions differed across encoding models, the resulting communities captured major temporal expression programs, and functional annotations based on gene ontology and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes pathway analyses provided exploratory biological context. The detected communities were comparable to those obtained using conventional methods, including weighted correlation network analysis and fuzzy c-means clustering. Furthermore, as a proof-of-concept, we performed SWAP-test circuit simulations to mimic fidelity computation on a quantum computer; under noise-aware conditions, these simulations produced less accurate fidelity estimates with higher computational cost than classical computation. As a proof-of-concept, this study provides a complementary view of temporal transcriptome organization, rather than a uniformly superior alternative to conventional methods.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
11.7%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.5%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.6%
5
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.6%
6
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.6%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 11%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
10
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
11
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.4%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
13
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
14
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
15
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
20
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
22
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
24
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
25
Journal of Computational Biology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
26
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
27
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
29
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%