Back

Autopolyploidization presents a transient and potential-rich window of increased transcriptional plasticity in Arabidopsis arenosa.

Celestini, S.; Trvnickova, E.; Brindzak, M.; Kolar, F.

2026-06-17 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.16.732565 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Whole-genome duplication (WGD, polyploidization) is a pervasive feature of Eukaryote evolution and often viewed as a source of evolutionary success and novelty, meaning a macromutation leading to higher fitness (i.e. "hopeful monsters"). Yet, the mechanisms behind the (occasional) success of nascent polyploids remain still elusive, especially from a transcriptomic point of view. Theory suggests that duplicated genetic networks are characterised by enhanced redundancy and higher output variation, promoting the exploration of the adaptive landscape during stressful times. Artificially synthesized neo-polyploid mutants provide an exciting system to test this, however, empirical studies comparing co-expression network patterns between natural and synthetic ploidies of the same species in an evolutionary context are lacking. Here we compare diploid, synthetic and naturally established autotetraploid populations of Arabidopsis arenosa to investigate short- versus long-term effects of polyploidy on gene expression complexity and plasticity under water deficiency stress. Transcriptomic profiling revealed that synthetic neo-tetraploids explored the broadest expression space and exhibited the highest number of stress-responsive genes. Co-expression network analyses demonstrated that the network of neo-tetraploids was fragmented into multiple highly connected modules, with stress-responsive genes preferentially acting as inter-modular "bridges". In contrast, diploids and established tetraploids exhibited lower expression variation, more modular architectures, with stress response genes embedded within well-defined modules. Moreover, synthetic tetraploids displayed the highest number of modules correlated with plant fitness proxy suggesting higher output variance resulting from the transcriptional shock. Together, our results indicate that WGD induces a transient phase of transcriptomic expansion and network disorganization that broadens the phenotypic landscape, followed by evolutionary stabilization and finally retention of some advantageous novelties in established polyploids. This supports the view of neo-polyploids as "hopeful monsters", in which short-term instability creates a window of enhanced variability and plasticity with long-term evolutionary potential. SignificanceSince the early concept of polyploids as "hopeful monsters," biologists have hypothesized that whole-genome duplication can generate novel phenotypes and facilitate adaptation to environmental challenges. Yet the mechanisms linking genome doubling to evolutionary innovation remain poorly understood. By comparing diploid, synthetic autotetraploid, and naturally established autotetraploid populations of Arabidopsis arenosa, we show that newly formed polyploids undergo a transient phase of expanded transcriptomic variation and extensive regulatory network rewiring. In contrast, established polyploids exhibit a more stable and modular network architecture. Our results provide empirical support for a long-standing evolutionary hypothesis, showing how genome duplication can temporarily broaden the range of possible phenotypes before subsequent stabilization through evolution.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.5%
2
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.4%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
5
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 14%
3.9%
7
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
8
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
9
Plant and Cell Physiology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
11
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
16
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.1%
18
Molecular Plant
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
20
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.0%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
23
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
24
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%
25
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%