Back

Same-section spatial metabolo-transcriptomics using Stereo-meta-seq reveals DHA-driven kidney maturation

van Scheppingen, R. H.; Wu, B.; Zhang, Y.; Schep, S.; Winter, U.; Wang, F.; Zou, Y.; Chuva de Sousa Lopes, S. M.; Silver, D.; Sidorov, I.; Giera, M.; van den Berg, B. M.; van den Berg, C. W.; Hui, L.; Rabelink, T. J.; Wang, G.

2026-07-08 cell biology
10.64898/2026.06.16.732541 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A central unresolved question in developmental biology is whether local metabolites merely accompany, or actively instruct, tissue maturation. Addressing this question requires direct spatial coupling of metabolic states with genome-wide transcriptional programs in situ at high spatial resolution, which existing approaches do not readily achieve. Here, we introduce Stereo-meta-seq, a workflow that integrates quantitative MALDI-MSI with Stereo-seq spatial transcriptomics within a single tissue section. A conductive adapter was designed to overcome the electrical incompatibility of non-conductive Stereo-seq chips with vacuum MALDI platforms, improving efficiency of MSI detection that preserves RNA integrity. MALDI laser-ablation marks are retained in downstream Stereo-seq data and serve as intrinsic fiducials for direct co-registration at 10 m or 20 m resolution, enabling fine grained spatial metabolite-transcript integration. Applying Stereo-meta-seq to human kidney development, we uncover selective enrichment of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in maturing proximal tubules. Functional studies in human kidney organoids demonstrate that DHA activates PPAR-and HNF4-driven transcriptional programs and promotes proximal tubule maturation in vitro and after transplantation in vivo. These findings identify lipid metabolism as an instructive regulator of human nephrogenesis and establish Stereo-meta-seq as a practical platform for dissecting metabolite-gene coupling and tissue heterogeneity in situ.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.