Back

Linking automated image analysis to ecological inference: high-throughput monitoring of soil fauna

Hendrikx, H.; Belaud, E.; Postic, F.; Scalabrino, M.; Lebeau, M.; Le Maire, G.; Jourdan, C.; Gallet, P.; Hedde, M.

2026-06-16 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.16.732537 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1 - Automated in situ sensors - e.g., buried scanners - are transforming biodiversity monitoring by generating data at spatio-temporal resolutions unattainable through traditional sampling, including in cryptic environments such as soil that have remained largely inaccessible to existing methods. However, extracting ecologically meaningful information from these data streams requires substantial image processing effort that currently constitutes a critical bottleneck, particularly when the signal-to-noise ratio is low and annotated training data are scarce. 2 - Standard end-to-end deep learning detection pipelines offer unsatisfactory results due to the lack of training data and heterogeneity of the taxa of interest. We explore the potential of combining traditional computer vision algorithms with state-of-the-art deep learning models to build an efficient raw data processing pipelines from limited annotation effort. Specifically, based on the observation that the background barely changes, we focus on the differences between two consecutive images to turn the initial detection problem (with very low signal) into a simpler classification problem, which we solve by fine-tuning foundation models on limited annotated data. 3 - Our approach significantly reduces the annotation effort, allowing us to release an open dataset with about 600 soil scans and more than 8 000 labeled invertebrate occurrences across nine taxa. Using this dataset to train our models, we obtained population count estimates with relative errors ranging from 10% to 61% across taxa over a three-month period. Ecological validation through a land-use stability analysis showed full directional congruence between automated and expert-annotated classifications across all nine taxa examined, with effect-size discrepancies proportional to per-taxon classification accuracy. 4 - These results demonstrate that combining domain-specific heuristics with fine-tuned foundation models provides an effective and data-efficient strategy for automating ecological image processing workflows in low-signal, data-scarce contexts. The validated pipeline removes the manual annotation bottleneck that has historically limited scanner-based soil monitoring to short observational windows and restricted taxonomic scope, opening the way for continuous, large-scale tracking of soil invertebrate community dynamics at resolutions previously unachievable.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
4
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.1%
6
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
7
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.2%
10
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.8%
12
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
14
Remote Sensing
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
17
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.4%
19
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
21
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%
27
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.6%
28
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%