Back

Reduction of PALS1/Nok disrupts retinal lamination through altered cell positioning while preserving photoreceptor self-organization capacity

Aparicio, G.;Zolessi, F.

2026-06-17 Developmental Biology
10.64898/2026.06.16.732437 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The vertebrate neural retina is composed of several neuronal types that precisely organize into layers, with photoreceptors facing the outer surface and the projection neurons, retinal ganglion cells, at the innermost layer. This organization, essential for its function, is established during early development through a complex process involving cell-cell interactions such as adhesion. In the case of photoreceptors, two adhesion complexes, based on the adhesive proteins Cadherin2 and Crumbs, appear essential for their correct localization at the outer nuclear layer (ONL). We here aimed at better characterizing the role of the scaffolding protein PALS1, a central component of the Crumbs complex. Through a validated pals1a/nok morpholino knockdown strategy in zebrafish embryos, we demonstrate that its reduced expression causes photoreceptor progenitors to initially disperse as actively migrating cells, to then coalesce into cell groups around the central retina. They eventually start polarizing, forming rosette-like structures with the apical border towards the inside. Conversely, in organoids derived from uncommitted neuroepithelial retinal progenitors, PALS1 deficiency causes an inversion of their localization from internal rosette-like structures to an organized superficial layer. In both conditions, photoreceptors show signs of polarization, with apical borders towards the inside of rosettes in wild-type organoids, to surface-directed apical borders in morphants. Altogether, our results support previous observations of the pivotal function of the Crumbs complex in ONL formation, but also indicate that either the Crumbs complex, or PALS1 itself, are central for the delicate balance in differential cell adhesion partly responsible for retinal lamination.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.9%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 6%
12.7%
3
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
4
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
8.9%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.8%
7
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.3%
8
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
11
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
12
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Developmental Cell
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Cell Communication and Signaling
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
The EMBO Journal
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
19
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
96 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
21
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.0%
23
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
25
Cell Death Discovery
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%