Back

PolyFold: Evaluation of Open-Use Molecular Structure Prediction Algorithms to Inform Their Utility in Diverse Biological Applications

Stephenson, H.; Voicu, D.; Novakov, V.; Levy, M.; Marsilio, J.

2026-06-16 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.16.732304 bioRxiv
Show abstract

With the growing use of machine-learning-assisted pipelines for designing, characterizing, and optimizing biomolecules, the reliability of structure prediction models is increasingly important. PolyFold is a benchmarking framework developed to evaluate open-use structure prediction models, Boltz-2 and OpenFold 3, as commercially accessible alternatives to AlphaFold 3. We outline an end-to-end workflow automation tool to streamline input file creation, batch automation, and comprehensive analysis of model outputs for leading open-use structure prediction models. We curated an evaluation dataset of several thousand high-quality Protein Data Bank structures, homology-filtering against the training sets of both models to ensure a fair analysis. We then implemented an evaluation pipeline incorporating structural metrics (RMSD, TM-score, lDDT, etc.), interface metrics (DockQ, ilDDT, iRMSD, etc.), and physicochemical realism checks (based on bond lengths, angles, molecular internal energies, etc.). We identify key performance disparities, observing that Boltz-2 is generally superior to OpenFold 3, though the differential is partially attributable to residual homology leakage not accounted for by prevailing test set curation practices. We thus recommend a new method for homology-reducing when building a test set using length-weighted average fractional identity cutoffs rather than lowest chain fractional identity cutoffs. Even in eliminating residual leakage, Boltz-2 still performs better on full-set comparisons and a variety of important partitions (nucleic acids, protein-ligands, Ab-Ags, etc.). Both models are strong at folding monomeric structures, though struggle with homomultimer placement and small molecule physical realism, demonstrating enduring limitations of machine learning methods. This work is the first end-to-end, open-use, and reproducible platform for systematically assessing state-of-the-art structure prediction models. PolyFold enables practitioners to determine how models compare in performance on specific inference tasks and supports the broader adoption of accessible computational tools to facilitate biomolecular science.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.7%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.5%
3
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.4%
4
Journal of Cheminformatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
6
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.5%
7
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Open Source Software
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
9
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.1%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
12
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.7%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
15
Protein Engineering, Design and Selection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.6%
17
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.3%
19
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
20
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
21
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
23
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Journal of Structural Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%