Back

Expert in Ultrasound Skills: Feasibility of an IMU-video platform to describe technical profiles during focused cardiac ultrasound. Pilot study

morales, f. r.; Gonzalez, S. R.; Osses, M. F. S.; Hernandez, B. L.; Ramirez, D. A.

2026-06-18 emergency medicine
10.64898/2026.06.16.26355788 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) is operator dependent and requires coordinated probe manipulation, image interpretation and iterative visual feedback. Existing assessment approaches often emphasize final image quality or expert rating. We developed Expert in Ultrasound Skills (EXUS) , a platform that synchronizes transducer-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU) data with ultrasound video, and evaluated its technical feasibility during FoCUS acquisition. Methods: This observational pilot study included 6 operators performing two repetitions of a four-view FoCUS protocol, yielding 12 analytical sessions and 48 planned acquisitions. Feasibility was defined by acquisition completion, video availability, start/stop events, fused IMU-video windows, temporal coverage, complete human label entries and IMU integrity. A 100-image Likert rating task was used to summarize pairwise inter-rater agreement for still-frame image quality assessment. Results: All 48 planned acquisitions were completed with video, start/stop events, fused windows and complete human label entries. Temporal coverage was at least 90% in 47/48 acquisitions. IMU integrity endpoints exceeded the 80% threshold: 43/48 acquisitions had no extreme IMU-derived artifact, 43/48 had no active-segment IMU restart and 44/48 had no complete motion flatline. Mean pairwise exact agreement for the Likert task was 38.9%, with mean quadratic-weighted Cohen's kappa of 0.564. Post hoc profiles varied across duration, visual quality, mechanical load and motor efficiency. Conclusions: EXUS was technically feasible for synchronized IMU-video capture during FoCUS. The pilot supports multimodal acquisition data as a way to describe technical profiles and generate formative feedback hypotheses, but the post hoc indices are not validated competency measures. Keywords: focused cardiac ultrasound; point-of-care ultrasound; inertial measurement unit; medical education; deliberate practice

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.1%
3
Emergency Medicine Journal
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.7%
5
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.1%
6
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
8
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.4%
9
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
10
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
11
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
12
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
13
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
15
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
17
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
20
Journal of Visualized Experiments
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
BioMed Research International
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Hypertension
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
25
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
27
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
Annals of Translational Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
29
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%