Back

Biomedical Capacity, Governance, and Health Security: A Dominican Republic Research Analysis of Stakeholder Perspectives

Baez, A. A.; Schad, A.; Malamud, W.; Montas, M. C.

2026-06-18 health policy
10.64898/2026.06.16.26355767 medRxiv
Show abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed critical vulnerabilities in globally concentrated biomedical supply chains and accelerated interest in nearshoring and hemispheric health-security strategies. The Dominican Republic, already the third-largest medical device exporter in Latin America, occupies a strategically significant but institutionally constrained position within this realignment. This study evaluates stakeholder perceptions of the principal opportunities and barriers affecting biomedical ecosystem development in the Dominican Republic, with particular attention to governance, workforce capacity, and value-chain upgrading pathways. Methods. A concurrent mixed-methods design was employed, integrating a cross-sectional electronic survey of 142 purposively sampled domain experts (administered September-December 2025) with a qualitative executive consultation with senior government and industry leaders. Survey analyses combined descriptive statistics, one-sample t-tests against the scale neutral midpoint, chi-square goodness-of-fit tests, Friedman non-parametric ranking, Spearman rank correlations, and exploratory linear and logistic multivariable regression. Qualitative responses were analyzed using a framework approach grounded in the Triple Helix model of innovation systems. Results. Perceived government support was significantly below neutral (mean = 2.67, SD = 1.12; p = 0.034). Workforce shortages (83.3%) and weak academia-industry collaboration (71.4%) were the most frequently endorsed barriers ({chi}2(5) = 18.7, p = 0.002). Regulatory modernization (88.1%) and workforce development (85.7%) ranked as the highest-priority policy levers (Friedman p = 0.005). Clinical trials and contract research organization services were the dominant sub-sector priority (76.2%, binomial p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, perceived government support, talent availability, and confidence in IP protection jointly explained 46% of the variance in sector competitiveness (R2 = 0.46, p < 0.001). Strong majority support existed for a formal public-private biomedical coordination authority (73.8%, p < 0.001).Conclusion. Institutional credibility and advanced human capital--rather than geography or market access--are the perceived binding constraints on the Dominican Republics biomedical trajectory. Regulatory modernization, targeted workforce investment, and the establishment of a national biomedical coordination authority represent the highest-leverage interventions for positioning the country as a hemispheric hub for biomedical manufacturing, clinical research, and health security.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
22.1%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.7%
3
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.0%
4
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Health Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
7
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
9
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
13
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
16
BMC Medical Education
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 70%
1.0%
19
Animals
23 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
21
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%