Back

Method comparisons for differentiation of Schizophrenia and Bipolar based on rs-fMRI Intrinsic and Functional Networks

Janeva, D.; Breyton, M.; Markovska-Simoska, S.; Guilhaumou, R.; Petkoski, S.; Iraji, A.; Calhoun, V.; Gerazov, B.

2026-06-17 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.06.16.26355608 medRxiv
Show abstract

Psychosis as a symptom manifests in schizophenia and bipolar disorder, two highly heterogeneous psychiatric illnesses with overlapping clinical manifestations. Resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rsfMRI), represents a promising tool for identifying objective biomarkers of functional brain alterations to aid differential diagnosis. In this work, we comparatively evaluate multiple rs-fMRI representations for differentiating schizophrenia and bipolar disorder using intrinsic connectivity network (ICN) temporal profiles and several functional network connectivity (FNC) approaches, including static, dynamic, and high-order connectivity analyses. The study was conducted on a cohort of 371 subjects with psychosis, while evaluation was performed using a separate held-out cohort of 315 subjects. We investigated convolutional neural network architectures applied to ICN temporal profiles, spectrograms, and scalograms, alongside classical machine learning models trained on connectivity-derived features. Across the evaluated approaches, ICN temporal profiles provided the most consistent discriminative performance, with a 1D convolutional neural network achieving the strongest overall results under the benchmark protocol. Among connectivity-based methods, static functional connectivity generally outperformed dynamic and high-order representations, suggesting that increased representational complexity did not necessarily translate into improved generalization. Although the obtained classification performance remained modest, the results highlight the challenges of robust psychosis differentiation using rs-fMRI while emphasizing the relative stability of low-order connectivity representations and temporal ICN features. These findings contribute to ongoing efforts toward reproducible and interpretable neuroimaging biomarkers for psychiatric disorders.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.4%
2
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.6%
3
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.7%
4
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
5
Schizophrenia
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
6
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
Schizophrenia Bulletin
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
9
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
10
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
11
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
12
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.3%
15
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
16
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
17
Nature Mental Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
18
Schizophrenia Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
19
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
20
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
21
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
22
BMC Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
23
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
24
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Brain Imaging and Behavior
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%