Back

Decoding Bispecific Antibody Developability: Design Rules and Predictive Models from a 160-Member Library

Ritter, S.; Rand, L.; Karthick, S.; Bloomingdale, T.; Smith, A.; Ao, X.; Pierre, Y.; Harris, B.; Moller, J.; Bhatt, A.; Bhatt, R.; Schwartz, J.; Grippo, L.; Cohen, R.; Borhani, D. W.; Tessier, P. M.; Arsiwala, A.

2026-06-19 biophysics
10.64898/2026.06.15.732449 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bispecific antibodies deliver functional outcomes that monospecific antibodies cannot, yet emergent self-association, polyreactivity, and aggregation often degrade their developability relative to their parental arms. Whether bispecific developability inherits from the parents or is driven by the format has not been tested at scale. We characterized 160 bispecific antibodies and their 65 parental arms on a uniform knobs-into-holes CrossMab IgG1 scaffold across 10 assays on the PROPHET-Ab high-throughput platform. Bispecific developability separates into three classes of inheritance. Hydrophobicity and surface charge inherit cleanly from the parents (Spearman {rho} {approx} 0.85 to 0.95), so parental-level screening predicts bispecific fate. Self-association and polyreactivity inherit partially ({rho} {approx} 0.60 to 0.88), with mechanistically interpretable emergent outliers driven in part by Fv-Fv charge complementarity and a parental biophysical ceiling on the hydrophobicity (HIC) by surface-charge (HAC) plane. Thermostability is poorly predicted from parental antibodies ({rho} < 0.4), so it requires bispecific-level testing. The class framework yields actionable selection rules: triage hydrophobicity and charge at the parental level, avoid pairing two high-HIC x high-HAC arms, pair opposite-sign Fv charges to suppress self-association but re-validate at the formulation buffer, and measure thermostability on the bispecific itself. This work charts a tractable path from monospecific sequence to bispecific developability prediction. SignificanceBispecific antibodies are a fast-growing therapeutic class, yet the rational design of well-behaving bispecific antibodies from validated monospecific antibody building blocks remains challenging. A key bottleneck is the lack of comprehensive, high-quality public datasets linking parental antibody developability properties to corresponding bispecific antibody developability properties. We address this gap by releasing a dataset comprising 160 bispecific antibodies and the 65 parental monospecific antibodies profiled in 10 developability assays. The data show that bispecific antibody developability is complex. Some properties are easily predictable from the parents, whereas others emerge in the bispecific format or from the bispecific format itself. The factors that govern each property can be identified empirically and used to make practical selection decisions. The mechanistic explanations and predictive models reported here establish a compact set of actionable rules. Together, they define a framework for using computational pipelines to convert monospecific antibodies into bispecific antibodies with drug-like developability properties, enabling faster and more effective generation of high-quality bispecific antibodies for diverse therapeutic applications.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mAbs
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
3
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.3%
5
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 13%
4.0%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Chemistry
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
9
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.6%
11
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
13
JACS Au
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
77 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
16
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Cell Chemical Biology
94 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
21
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
25
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
RSC Chemical Biology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
29
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%