Back

DNA Polymerase Beta Catalytic and Fidelity Mutations Drive Platinum Specific Drug Sensitivity

Lindquist, J.;Heyza, J.;Ndoja, I.;Movahhedin, N.;Yunker, C.;Cardo-Vila, M.;Kim, S.;Sweasy, J.;Patrick, S.

2026-06-19 Cancer Biology
10.64898/2026.06.15.732403 bioRxiv
Show abstract

With the advent of genome sequencing and its widespread use in the clinic, there is a great need to identify mutational biomarkers that predict therapeutic responses. DNA polymerase Beta (Pol{beta}) and the base excision repair (BER) pathway have been previously implicated as modulators of response to platinum-based chemotherapies and are mutated in as high as 30% of cancers. Here, we show in a triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) model that two classes of mutations in Pol{beta}, reduced catalytic activity (E295K and D256A mutation) and reduced fidelity (I260M), are sufficient to drive cisplatin and carboplatin-specific sensitivity. Cellular response to oxaliplatin in these Pol{beta} mutant models is minimal relative to cisplatin and carboplatin. Additionally, we show that sensitivity is associated with reduced repair of both platinum-induced DNA intrastrand adducts and interstrand crosslinks (ICLs). Downregulation of the upstream BER factor uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG) reverses drug sensitivity consistent with these Pol{beta} mutations negatively impacting ICL DNA repair to drive drug sensitivity. In addition, intrastrand adduct repair readout indicates these lesions also play a role in the sensitivity observed in Pol{beta} mutant models. In vivo studies demonstrate a significant effect on tumor growth delay with cisplatin treatment in tumor xenografts harboring Pol{beta} mutations. These results support the potential for using Pol{beta} mutations as predictive biomarkers for cisplatin and carboplatin therapies in the clinical setting.

Published in Cancers (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.