Back

Continuous monitoring of plant transpiration dynamics with a leaf-mounted sensor across environmental conditions

MIRANDA, M.;Pereira, L.;Kreinert, S.;Ott, J.;Fernandes, A.;Carvalho, C.;Jansen, S.;Ribeiro, R.

2026-06-16 Plant Biology
10.64898/2026.06.15.732311 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LITranspiration plays a central role in plant water relations and strongly influences plant growth. Continuous monitoring is essential for understanding responses to environmental conditions and improving water management in both natural and agricultural systems. Gas-exchange techniques such as infrared gas analysers (IRGAs) and porometers are widely used but are challenging for long-term or large-scale monitoring. On the other hand, the FylloClip is a low-cost, leaf-mounted capacitance sensor developed previously to monitor transpiration by detecting condensation of water vapour near the leaf surface. Here, we evaluated the potential of the FylloClip for monitoring transpiration dynamics and assessed environmental conditions that may affect its performance. C_LIO_LIThe FylloClip was tested under growth chamber, greenhouse, and tropical field conditions. We evaluated how its capacitance measurements respond to rainfall, temperature and humidity, and compared FylloClip measurements with transpiration measured with an IRGA. C_LIO_LIThere was a strong correlation (r = 0.85) between FylloClip and IRGA data. Both systems captured similar diurnal transpiration patterns, with transpiration declining simultaneously under water deficit. Rainfall and very high relative humidity produced FylloClip signals that could be misinterpreted as high transpiration, although transpiration is negligible under these conditions. C_LIO_LIOur results revealed that FylloClips capture temporal patterns of transpiration with high accuracy and resolution, providing a reliable tool for long-term, large-scale monitoring of transpiration dynamics in ecophysiological studies and precision agriculture. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.