Back

CRISPR-Mediated Linearization of IDLV Donor Enables Precise Targeted Integration in Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Scalisi, G.; Sakkal, A.; Lacombe, L.; Sarnari, F.; Rouillon, M.; Rosiello, M.; Tachtsidi, A.; Galbiati, P.; Corre, G.; Oustelandt, J.; Pavani, G.; Laurent, M.; Firth, M.; As, M.; Maresca, M.; Peyron, I.; Lenting, P. J.; Galy, A.; Miccio, A.; Amendola, M.

2026-07-08 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.06.15.732298 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ex vivo genome editing of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) requires targeted integration strategies that support large therapeutic DNA payloads while preserving stem cell fitness. Although CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair using AAV donors is effective, it is constrained by limited cargo capacity and adverse effects on long-term HSPCs function. Integrase-defective lentiviral vectors (IDLVs) offer an alternative donor platform, yet their precise and controlled genomic integration remains inefficient. Here, we describe TILV (Targeted Integration of Lentiviral Vector), a CRISPR-assisted knock-in strategy that exploits Cas9-mediated linearization of episomal IDLV DNA to expose a single homology arm and engage homology-mediated end-joining repair pathways. TILV enables precise, directional and seamless integration of transgenes in multiple loci, enabling constitutive or physiological expression. Using single-cell clonal analyses and targeted long-read sequencing, we define the molecular features of TILV-mediated integration and demonstrate preferential use of CRISPR-linearized episomal substrates. TILV supports accurate insertion of large therapeutic transgenes, without compromising HSPC viability or multilineage potential. We further show that transient modulation of DNA repair pathway, in combination with extended homology arms, enhances integration efficiency and junctional precision. Importantly, optimized TILV enables targeted integration in phenotypically defined long-term HSPCs, highlighting its potential for scalable and durable gene therapy.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Therapy
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.5%
3
Blood
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.5%
4
Cell Stem Cell
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
5
Stem Cell Reports
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
6
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.2%
7
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.5%
9
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
10
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
11
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 23%
2.2%
13
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
14
HemaSphere
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.5%
18
EMBO Molecular Medicine
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
20
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
21
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
22
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
23
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
25
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
26
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%