Distinct types of gut dysbiosis and oral-gut microbial signatures differentiate C. difficile, Campylobacter, and Salmonella infections: a cross-sectional study
Mahnic, A.; Markovic, R.; Marhl, M.; Golle, A.; Stopnisek, N.; Rupnik, M.
Show abstract
Gastrointestinal bacterial infections are associated with substantial perturbations of the gut microbiota, yet most microbiome studies have examined individual pathogens in isolation, limiting identification of shared and pathogen-specific microbial signatures across enteric infections. We performed a comparative analysis of fecal microbiota profiles from 586 stool samples using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, encompassing infections caused by Clostridioides difficile, Campylobacter spp., and Salmonella spp., alongside viral gastroenteritis, diagnostic-negative samples, and healthy controls. Fecal calprotectin concentrations were measured in a subset of samples to assess intestinal inflammation. Comparative analyses revealed two major dysbiotic configurations among bacterial enteric infections. C. difficile infection was characterized by an Enterococcus-dominated community structure, whereas Campylobacter and Salmonella infections were associated with enrichment of a tightly correlated consortium of oral-associated taxa, including Streptococcus, Granulicatella, and Haemophilus. These taxa were among the most informative features in an XGBoost machine-learning classifier, which accurately discriminated bacterial infection types from one another and from viral infections and healthy-associated microbiota profiles (macro F1 score = 0.74). In contrast, expansion of Enterobacteriaceae represented a shared, non-specific signature of intestinal disturbance and was associated with elevated fecal calprotectin concentrations. Together, these findings demonstrate that bacterial enteric infections are associated with distinct microbiota configurations that distinguish pathogen-specific signatures from general infection-related dysbiosis. The enrichment of oral-associated taxa in Campylobacter and Salmonella infections suggests a potential role for the oral-gut microbial axis in bacterial gastroenteritis and provides a foundation for future mechanistic studies and the development of microbiota-informed diagnostic, preventive, and therapeutic strategies. Author SummaryBacterial infections of the intestine can cause severe diarrhea and inflammation, but their effects on the community of microbes living in the gut are not fully understood. Most previous studies have focused on a single disease-causing organism, making it difficult to determine which microbiome changes are shared across infections and which are specific to particular pathogens. In this study, we compared gut microbiota profiles from people infected with Clostridioides difficile, Campylobacter, or Salmonella, and examined these alongside samples from individuals with viral gastroenteritis, diagnostic-negative diarrhea, and healthy controls. We found that bacterial enteric infections were associated with two distinct patterns of microbiome disruption. C. difficile infection was linked to an overgrowth of Enterococcus, whereas Campylobacter and Salmonella infections were characterized by increased levels of several bacterial groups that are commonly found in the mouth. In contrast, expansion of Enterobacteriaceae was observed across different infections and appeared to reflect general intestinal disturbance rather than a specific pathogen. Our findings identify microbial signatures that distinguish different bacterial infections and suggest that bacteria originating from the oral cavity may play an important role in some forms of gastroenteritis. These results provide a foundation for future studies aimed at understanding how microbial communities influence intestinal infection and recovery.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mucosal washes are useful for sampling intestinal mucus-associated microbiota despite low biomass 96%
- Enhancing Recovery from Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis and Alleviating DSS-Induced Colitis in Mice with a Consortium of Rare Short-Chain Fatty Acid-Producing Bacteria 96%
- Species- and strain-level assessment using rrn long-amplicons suggests donor's influence on gut microbial transference via fecal transplants in metabolic syndrome subjects 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Profound taxonomic and functional gut microbiota alterations associated with trichuriasis: cross-country and country-specific patterns 96%
- Distinct Colon Mucosa Microbiomes associated with Tubular Adenomas and Serrated Polyps 95%
- Short-term supplementation of celecoxib shifted butyrate production and ameliorated inflammation on a simulated model of the gut microbial ecosystem 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Upper respiratory microbial communities of healthy populations are shaped by niche and age 96%
- Altitude-dependent agro-ecologies impact the microbiome diversity of scavenging indigenous chicken in Ethiopia 95%
- Accurate identification and quantification of commensal microbiota bound by host immunoglobulins 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying Clostridioides difficile-inhibiting gut commensals using culturomics, phenotyping, and combinatorial community assembly 96%
- Consumption of a Western-style diet modulates the response of the murine gut microbiome to ciprofloxacin 95%
- Temporal dynamics of gut microbiomes in non-industrialized urban Amazonia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Statistical evaluation of metaproteomics and 16s rRNA amplicon sequencing techniques for the study of the gut microbiota establishment of infants with cystic fibrosis 95%
- High-throughput single-cell isolation of Bifidobacterium strains from the gut microbiome 94%
- Microbiota of the pregnant mouse: characterization of the bacterial communities in the oral cavity, lung, intestine, and vagina through culture and DNA sequencing 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.