Back

Multitrophic interaction networks mediate biodiversity effects on ecosystem multifunctionality

Albert, G.; Staab, M.; Luo, A.; Anttonen, P.; Beugnon, R.; Cesarz, S.; Chen, J.; Eisenhauer, N.; Erfmeier, A.; Fornoff, F.; Guo, P.; Haerdtle, W.; Hoenig, L.; Jiang, L.; Klein, A.-M.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, Q.; Liu, L.; Ma, K.; von Oheimb, G.; Rutten, G.; Scholten, T.; Seitz, S.; Singavarapu, B.; Trogisch, S.; Wang, M.-Q.; Wang, P.; Wu, D.; Wubet, T.; Yang, X.; Yu, M.; Zhang, N.; Schmid, B.; Bruelheide, H.; Liu, X.; Zhu, C.-D.; Schuldt, A.

2026-06-18 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.15.732252 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biodiversity loss threatens the multifunctionality of ecosystems on which human well-being ultimately depends. Changes in multitrophic species interactions may be key to explaining the ecological consequences of biodiversity loss, but research explicitly linking species interactions and ecosystem multifunctionality remains rare. To assess interaction-mediated biodiversity effects and underlying mechanisms, characterizing the structure of species interaction networks is invaluable. Using comprehensive species interaction and ecosystem functioning data from a large-scale tree biodiversity experiment, we find consistent effects of the structure of species interaction networks on ecosystem multifunctionality across multiple types of antagonistic and mutualistic interactions. While positive effects of network size align with expected positive effects of multitrophic species diversity, positive effects of niche overlap among interacting species and negative effects of highly connected species (i.e. high linkage density) reveal additional, interaction-mediated drivers of multifunctionality. Specifically, the effects of niche overlap suggest benefits of functionally similar species, and the effects of linkage density underscore the importance of specialized interactions in promoting ecosystem multifunctionality. These findings emphasize that to effectively safeguard ecosystem service provisioning, ecosystem management and biodiversity conservation not only need to account for biodiversity changes at multiple trophic levels, but also explicitly for how species interact among each other.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.6%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.4%
3
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.7%
5
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.7%
6
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
8
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
9
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.3%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 14%
3.9%
11
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
14
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.4%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.3%
18
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
19
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
21
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Biological Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%
25
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%