Back

Habitat restoration promotes recolonisation by extirpated species in model meta food webs

Thompson, L. R.; Lurgi, M.

2026-06-19 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.15.731902 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Successful ecosystem restoration is intimately linked to the persistence of species in local communities and across landscapes. As such quantitative approaches to ecological restoration require the integration of community and metapopulation ecology. Together these disciplines demonstrate that local colonisation, via habitat connectivity and size, and species interactions, both modulate the process of community assembly. However, thus far restoration ecology still remains disconnected from network ecology this preventing a holistic, community-wide perspective to restoration. We aim to inform ecological restoration using a multi-layer modelling framework integrating ecological interactions and species dispersal dynamics. We explore the drivers that modulate recolonisation dynamics of species across restored landscapes. We further investigate how restoration improves the structural properties of food webs, the number of successful recolonisations and the role of configuration of restored patches in restoration outcomes. We find that recolonisation is the result of a trade-off between dispersal ability and energy requirements. 97% of plant recolonisation and 88% of herbivore recolonisations happened within close proximity to the source patches. Better dispersers - intermediate and top species in the food webs - were able to recolonise habitat by benefitting from the increased biomass influx from restoration. When only a small proportion of the landscape could be restored, the location and connectivity of restored areas strongly influenced the outcome of restoration: more connected patches enabled on average the recolonisation of about 1 additional intermediate species compared to that of isolated patches. However, this difference faded as soon as more patches were restored, and improving larger portions of the landscape always resulted in better outcomes. Restoring 1/3 of the landscape enabled on average the recolonisation of ~4 additional species. Our findings suggest that quantitative models can inform restoration efforts necessary to bring native species back to restored areas. They also suggest that attention should be given to the requirements of the recolonisers, the distance of their introduction from restored areas and their trophic and ecological niche. These aspects are crucial to assess their energy and habitat requirements for successful establishment.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.0%
2
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.6%
3
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.0%
5
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
7
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
8
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.1%
11
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
13
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
14
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
15
Theoretical Ecology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.5%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.1%
20
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Conservation Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
23
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 71%
1.0%
24
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
25
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
26
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%
27
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%