Habitat restoration promotes recolonisation by extirpated species in model meta food webs
Thompson, L. R.; Lurgi, M.
Show abstract
Successful ecosystem restoration is intimately linked to the persistence of species in local communities and across landscapes. As such quantitative approaches to ecological restoration require the integration of community and metapopulation ecology. Together these disciplines demonstrate that local colonisation, via habitat connectivity and size, and species interactions, both modulate the process of community assembly. However, thus far restoration ecology still remains disconnected from network ecology this preventing a holistic, community-wide perspective to restoration. We aim to inform ecological restoration using a multi-layer modelling framework integrating ecological interactions and species dispersal dynamics. We explore the drivers that modulate recolonisation dynamics of species across restored landscapes. We further investigate how restoration improves the structural properties of food webs, the number of successful recolonisations and the role of configuration of restored patches in restoration outcomes. We find that recolonisation is the result of a trade-off between dispersal ability and energy requirements. 97% of plant recolonisation and 88% of herbivore recolonisations happened within close proximity to the source patches. Better dispersers - intermediate and top species in the food webs - were able to recolonise habitat by benefitting from the increased biomass influx from restoration. When only a small proportion of the landscape could be restored, the location and connectivity of restored areas strongly influenced the outcome of restoration: more connected patches enabled on average the recolonisation of about 1 additional intermediate species compared to that of isolated patches. However, this difference faded as soon as more patches were restored, and improving larger portions of the landscape always resulted in better outcomes. Restoring 1/3 of the landscape enabled on average the recolonisation of ~4 additional species. Our findings suggest that quantitative models can inform restoration efforts necessary to bring native species back to restored areas. They also suggest that attention should be given to the requirements of the recolonisers, the distance of their introduction from restored areas and their trophic and ecological niche. These aspects are crucial to assess their energy and habitat requirements for successful establishment.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.