Back

The road to nowhere: geolocation-by-genotype traces large-scale yellow-browed warbler vagrancy to central Siberia

Wynn, J.; Dierschke, J.; Dufour, P.; Langebrake, G.; Rollins, R.; Schmaljohann, H.; Salmon, P.; Irestedt, M.; Kunzel, S.; Bossu, C.; Ruegg, K.; Schnelle, A.; Zhao, T.; Sin, Y.; Bairlein, F.; Burnus, L.; Hosner, P.; Heim, W.; Karwinkel, T.; Jong, A.; Laine, V.; Michalik, A.; Neumann, M.; Packert, M.; Renner, S.; unsold, M.; Winkler, K.; Liedvogel, M.

2026-06-19 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.06.15.731303 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Vagrant animals - individuals found far outside their normal range - offer powerful natural experiments for understanding migratory mechanisms. The yellow-browed warbler (Phylloscopus inornatus) provides perhaps the best-yet example, typically migrating from Siberia to South/Southeast Asia yet found in increasingly large numbers in Western Europe. This represents a strikingly unresolved evolutionary puzzle: why do so many migrants consistently move in almost the complete wrong direction? A critical first step toward solving this enigma is determining where these birds come from. If vagrants came from the proximal western range edge this would imply simple disorientation, whilst a more easterly origin could imply large-scale reverse misorientation. Here, we develop a geolocation-by-genotype algorithm for low-coverage whole-genome resequencing data collected from feathers. Our method identifies spatially informative SNPs; clusters them to account for covariance in allele frequency through space; and employs a bootstrapped maximum-likelihood framework to estimate spatial origin with uncertainty. Applied to more than 80 European-caught birds, our results place their origin in central Siberia (118{degrees}E; 89-134{degrees}E [95% CI]); over 2000km east of the western range edge. These results suggest mass misorientation in a near-reverse direction, and highlight the yellow-browed warbler as an exceptional system for probing the mechanism, ontogeny and evolution of migration.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 7%
12.1%
2
Movement Ecology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.5%
3
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
4
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
5
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.5%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 8%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 5%
5.3%
8
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.3%
10
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
11
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
13
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
18
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
20
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.1%
22
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.8%
25
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
26
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
29
Ibis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%