Back

A Whole-Genome and Ancient DNA Perspective on the Drivers of Genetic Diversity and Structure in Palearctic True Lemmings

Dvoyashov, I.; Petrova, T.; Panitsina, V.; Bodrov, S.; Serdyuk, N.; Protopopov, A.; Klimovskiy, A.; Tiunov, M.; Lopatin, A.; Lavrenchenko, L.; Abramson, N.

2026-06-16 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.15.731284 bioRxiv
Show abstract

True lemmings (genus Lemmus) underwent substantial range shifts during the Late Pleistocene and the Pleistocene-Holocene transition, but the impact of these events on present-day diversity remains poorly understood. Here, we used whole-genome sequencing data from modern and ancient samples across the Palearctic range to address this knowledge gap. Reconstruction of autosomal phylogeny revealed that Palearctic true lemmings exhibit relatively shallow genetic structure, contrasting with the deep divergence inferred from mitochondrial genomes. Genetic variation largely follows an isolation-by-distance pattern, and no elevated nuclear divergence was detected between the major mitochondrial lineages. Window-based phylogenetic analyses identified several peripheral populations with high concordance factors, including Norway and Amur lemmings. The high degree of phylogenetic concordance along the genome in these populations is likely a consequence of postglacial bottlenecks and isolation, as indicated by reduced heterozygosity and the presence of runs of homozygosity in them. Overall, our results indicate that the modern genomic structure of Palearctic lemmings was shaped primarily by range fragmentation and population isolation following the broad distribution of the genus during the Last Glacial Maximum. Thus, the current genetic structure appears to represent only a fraction of the Late Pleistocene true lemming diversity. This is illustrated by a genetically distinct ancient specimen ([~]40 ka BP) from the Indigirka River basin that does not cluster with any modern lineage. From a taxonomic perspective, these findings do not support strong species-level differentiation among the major Palearctic lineages and highlight the discrepancy between mitochondrial and nuclear patterns of diversity within the genus.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
3
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.7%
5
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
7
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
9
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
10
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.1%
14
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.0%
16
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
17
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.6%
20
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
21
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
22
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
23
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%