Back

Toward a unified classification of acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplasia-related: a multicenter retrospective study

Liu, Y.; Loneman, D.; Bready, B.; Nemirovsky, D.; Cohen, A.; Wang, X.; Stein, E.; Zhang, Y.; Derkach, A.; Hasserjian, R. P.; Xiao, W.

2026-06-17 pathology
10.64898/2026.06.15.26355739 medRxiv
Show abstract

The 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Neoplasms (WHO5th) and the 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC) both recognize myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML-MR) as a diagnostic entity increasingly defined by integrated genomic data. Although largely concordant, the two classifications differ in various ways that should be resolved to achieve future harmonization. To address the areas of uncertainty, we retrospectively analyzed 615 newly diagnosed AML cases from adult patients treated at two large cancer centers. We demonstrate that AML-MR, whether defined by gene mutations (MR-GM) or cytogenetic abnormalities (MR-CGA), constitutes a prognostically distinct group with inferior outcome compared to most AML subtypes, second only to TP53-mutated or EVI1-rearranged AML. Isolated RUNX1 mutations were not associated with antecedent myeloid neoplasia. Neither the number of mutated MR genes nor their variant allele frequency independently impacted outcomes. Trisomy 8 and del(20q) did not confer inferior outcomes and may warrant exclusion from MR-CGA. Complex karyotype without TP53 mutations did not worsen outcomes within AML-MR and may be considered equivalent to other MR-CGA. The adverse prognosis of AML-MR appeared to be at least partly driven by ASXL1 and/or EZH2 mutations. These findings provide evidence toward a unified schema across the WHO5th and ICC.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Leukemia
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Modern Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.4%
3
Blood Cancer Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
6
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.7%
7
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
8
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
10
Journal of Clinical Pathology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
11
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
14
Molecular Cancer Research
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
15
Blood
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
17
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
Neoplasia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
19
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
20
HemaSphere
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
21
Clinical and Translational Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
22
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.6%
24
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
26
Cancer Letters
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
28
Experimental Hematology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%