Digital twin reconstruction of ventricular repolarisation identifies regional causes of T-wave abnormalities in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Coleman, J. A.; Camps, J.; Hasaballa, A. I.; Ariga, R.; Raman, B.; Olivotto, I.; Watkins, H. C.; Bueno-Orovio, A.
Show abstract
Background: Abnormal ventricular repolarisation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) may predispose patients to lethal arrhythmias, but repolarisation in HCM remains poorly spatially characterised. Integrating spatial cardiac magnetic resonance with ECG data has the potential to map electrical function throughout the ventricles. This study applied novel digital twin inverse ECG methods to map repolarisation patterns underlying abnormal T-waves in HCM. Methods: Patient-specific full ventricular electrophysiological models were iteratively refined to match the patient 12-lead ECG. Data from 32 healthy volunteers and 69 HCM patients were analysed, with inferred substrates incorporating activation times, repolarisation times, and rate-corrected action potential durations (APDcs). Patients were stratified by T-wave phenotype to identify distinct spatial repolarisation signatures associated with different ECG presentations. Results: Clinical 12-lead ECGs were accurately reproduced by the inferred ventricular models in 95 of 101 cases. Healthy volunteers (N=30) and HCM patients with normal T-waves (N=33) were characterised by apex-to-base APDc gradients of 60 ms (40?80) and 60 ms (30?80), respectively. HCM patients with V1-V3 T-wave abnormalities (N=6) had attenuated apex-to-base APDc gradients of 30 ms (-20?40) driven by apical-to-mid anterior APDc prolongation, greatest at the apical segment (?APDc vs. healthy: 54 ms; 95% CI: 23?84 ms). HCM patients with V4-V6 T wave abnormalities (N=21) had reversed apex-to-base APDc gradients of -20 ms (-40?0) driven by apical-to-mid APDc prolongation, most severe at the apical segment (?APDc vs. healthy: 94 ms; 95% CI: 74?120 ms). Despite significant APDc prolongation, only 4 of 69 HCM patients had QTc > 480 ms, due to masking by the intrinsically healthy longer APDcs at the ventricular base. Conclusions: Distinct spatial distributions of APDc prolongation, not necessarily mirroring the distribution of hypertrophy, underlie different ECG repolarisation phenotypes in HCM and may be missed by the QTc interval.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting Ventricular Tachycardia Circuits in Patients with Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy using Genotype-specific Heart Digital Twins 97%
- Personalized Computational Modeling Identifies Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source Patients with Potential Arrhythmic Substrate 94%
- A Titin Missense Variant Causes Atrial Fibrillation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence of Superior and Inferior Sinoatrial Nodes in the Mammalian Heart 93%
- Adrenergic Hypersensitivity Drives Ventricular Arrhythmias Following Loss of Plexin-Mediated Cardiac Innervation 93%
- Unraveling Chamber-specific Differences in Intercalated Disc Ultrastructure and Molecular Organization and Their Impact on Cardiac Conduction 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 93%
- Multimodal deep learning enhances diagnostic precision in left ventricular hypertrophy 92%
- Development and Multinational Validation of an Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Predicting Structural Heart Disease Using Noisy Single-lead Electrocardiograms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mechanistic Insights into Sex Differences in Atrial Electrophysiology and Arrhythmia Vulnerability through Sex-specific Computational Models. 94%
- Male sex hormone and reduced plakoglobin jointly impair atrial conduction and cardiac sodium currents 94%
- Mechanisms of spontaneous Ca2+ release-mediated arrhythmia in a novel 3D human atrial myocyte model: I. Transverse-axial tubule variation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.